Parental administration of analgesia to children attending the emergency department with acutely painful conditions.
Daly, T. K.; O'Brien, R.; Murphy, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundAcute paediatric pain management is often suboptimal in the emergency setting. There is a paucity of published literature on parental administration of analgesia to children, prior to their arrival at the emergency department (ED). The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of pre-hospital analgesic administration by parents/guardians of children [≤]16 years presenting to ED, with acutely painful conditions. MethodsThis was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted across two EDs in the South of Ireland with a collective annual attendance of approximately 100,000 patients. A consecutive sample of 400 parents/guardians of children aged between 6 months and 16 years, who were self-referred to ED with acutely painful conditions, were included. Data collected included patient demographics, pain score and analgesia administration. Data was analysed with SPSS software using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results189/400(47%) children received analgesia from their parents/guardians pre-ED arrival. Factors independently associated with increased parental administration of analgesia were: pain score [≥]5/10 53.4%(95%CI 48%-59%) vs [≤]4/10 29%(95%CI 21%-38%), children with siblings 49.7%(95%CI 45%-56%) vs without siblings 35.3%(95%CI 24%-47%) and presenting <48 hours from onset of pain 50.1%(95%CI 45%-55%) vs presenting [≥]48 hours 30.5%(95%CI 19%-42%). Of the 400 participants, 211(53%) received no analgesia before attending ED. Reasons for parents not administering analgesia included: 62/211(29.4%) did not think the child needed it, 39/211(18.5%) accident did not happen at home, 34/211(16.1%) did not want to mask the presence of the pain, 20/211(9.5%) believed the hospital should give medications, and 18/211(8.5%) afraid it would be wrong/harmful. ConclusionsOver half the children presenting to ED, with acutely painful conditions, did not receive adequate or timely pain relief pre-ED arrival, causing avoidable suffering. Parental misconceptions about acute pain management are major barrier to analgesic administration. Educational strategies are required to dispel misconceptions, which may ultimately improve the care for this population.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
- Pain Expectations, Experiences and Coping Strategies Used By Post-operative Patients: A Descriptive Phenomelogical Study 93%
- S-ketamine in patient-controlled analgesia with oxycodone improves analgesia in a dose-dependent manner after major lumbar fusion surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 93%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 92%
- Is higher-level trauma center care associated with better outcomes in patients injured by low-energy trauma? 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 91%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 91%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Severe bandemia is not associated with increased risk for adverse events in general pediatric emergency department patients 93%
- Age Based Trends for Unplanned Pediatric Rehospitalizations in the United States 92%
- Single-Center Hospital and Outpatient Opioid Use for Lower Extremity Arterial Disease 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.