Application of concise machine learning to construct accurate and interpretable EHR computable phenotypes
La Cava, W.; Lee, P. C.; Ajmal, I.; Ding, X.; Cohen, J. B.; Solanki, P.; Moore, J. H.; Herman, D. S.
Show abstract
ObjectiveElectronic health records (EHRs) can improve patient care by enabling systematic identification of patients for targeted decision support. But, this requires scalable learning of computable phenotypes. To this end, we developed the feature engineering automation tool (FEAT) and assessed it in targeting screening for the underdiagnosed, under-treated disease primary aldosteronism. Materials and MethodsWe selected 1,199 subjects receiving longitudinal care in a large health system and classified them for hypertension (N=608), hypertension with unexplained hypokalemia (N=172), and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (N=176) by chart review. We derived 331 features from EHR encounters, diagnoses, laboratories, medications, vitals, and notes. We modified FEAT to encourage model parsimony and compared its models performance and interpretability to those of expert-curated heuristics and conventional machine learning. ResultsFEAT models trained to replicate expert-curated heuristics had higher area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) than all other models (p < 0.001) except random forests and were smaller than all other models (p < 1e-6) except decision trees. FEAT models trained to predict chart review phenotypes exhibited similar AUPRC to penalized logistic regression while being simpler than all other models (p < 1e-6). For treatment-resistant hypertension, FEAT learned a six-feature, clinically intuitive model that demonstrated a positive predictive value of 0.70 and sensitivity of 0.62 in held-out testing data. DiscussionFEAT learns computable phenotypes that approach the performance of expert-curated heuristics and conventional machine learning without sacrificing interpretability. ConclusionBy constructing accurate and interpretable computable phenotypes at scale, FEAT has the potential to facilitate systematic clinical decision support.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous-Time and Dynamic Suicide Attempt Risk Prediction with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations 94%
- Clinical Knowledge Extraction via Sparse Embedding Regression (KESER) with Multi-Center Large Scale Electronic Health Record Data 94%
- Improving Pre-eclampsia Risk Prediction by Modeling Individualized Pregnancy Trajectories Derived from Routinely Collected Electronic Medical Record Data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Large Language Models Improve the Identification of Emergency Department Visits for Symptomatic Kidney Stones 94%
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 94%
- Machine learning approach to dynamic risk modeling of mortality in COVID-19: a UK Biobank study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.