Changes in cardiovascular disease monitoring in English primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational cohort study
Bankhead, C. R.; Lay-Flurrie, S.; Nicholson, B. D.; Sheppard, J. P.; Gale, C. P.; Liyanage, H.; McGagh, D.; Minchin, M.; Perera, R.; Sherlock, J.; Smith, M.; Thomas, N. P.; Wright Drakesmith, C.; de Lusignan, S. D.; Hobbs, R.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo quantify the impact and recovery in cardiovascular disease monitoring in primary care associated with the first COVID-19 lockdown. DesignRetrospective nationwide primary care cohort study, utilising data from 1st January 2018 to 27th September 2020. SettingWe extracted primary care electronic health records data from 514 primary care practices in England contributing to the Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners Clinical Informatics Digital Hub (ORCHID). These practices were representative of English primary care across urban and non-urban practices. ParticipantsThe ORCHID database included 6,157,327 active patients during the study period, and 13,938,390 patient years of observation (final date of follow-up 27th September 2020). The mean (SD) age was 38{+/-}24 years, 49.4% were male and the majority were of white ethnicity (65% [21.9% had unknown ethnicity]) ExposureThe primary exposure was the first national lockdown in the UK, starting on 23rd March 2020. Main outcome measuresRecords of cholesterol, blood pressure, HbA1c and International Normalised Ratio (INR) measurement derived from coded entries in the primary care electronic health record. ResultsRates of cholesterol, blood pressure, HbA1c and INR recording dropped by 23-87% in the week following the first UK national lockdown, compared with the previous week. The largest decline was seen in cholesterol (IRR 0.13, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.15) and smallest for INR (IRR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.81). Following the immediate drop, rates of recorded tests increased on average by 5-9% per week until 27th September 2020. However, the number of recorded measures remained below that expected for the time of year, reaching 51.8% (95% CI 51.8 to 51.9%) for blood pressure, 63.7%, (95% CI 63.7% to 63.8%) for cholesterol measurement and 70.3% (95% CI 70.2% to 70.4%) for HbA1c. Rates of INR recording declined throughout the previous two years, a trend that continued after lockdown. There were no differences in the times series trends based on sex, age, ethnicity or deprivation. ConclusionsCardiovascular disease monitoring in English primary care declined substantially from the time of the first UK lockdown. Despite a consistent recovery in activity, there is still a substantial shortfall in the numbers of recorded measurements to those expected. Strategies are required to ensure cardiovascular disease monitoring is maintained during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 93%
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 93%
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 collateral: Indirect acute effects of the pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK 96%
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 94%
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 95%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 93%
- The impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on those with lifelong conditions: a case study of congenital heart disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on recorded blood pressure screening and hypertension management in England: An analysis of monthly changes in Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators in OpenSAFELY 95%
- OpenSAFELY: impact of national guidance on switching from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in early phase of COVID-19 pandemic in England 94%
- Effect of a mobile health intervention optimised with artificial intelligence on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors in adults with high blood pressure: Rationale and design of My Intelligent Cardiac Assistant (MICArdiac) Randomised Controlled Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 93%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 91%
- Deaths from cardiovascular disease involving anticoagulants: a systematic synthesis of coroners’ case reports to prevent future deaths 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.