Predictors of Physical and Mental Health in Healthcare Teams Working with COVID-19 patients: a scoping review protocol.
Aguirre-Duarte, N.; Ovretveit, J.; Kenealy, T.
Show abstract
IntroductionAs a result of the current pandemic (COVID-19), many clinical teams are exposed to stressful situations that may lead to physical and mental issues for clinical staff themselves (we exclude the effects of personal infection with the virus). Recent studies suggest some predictors could depend on context, notably country and the type of the health system. Methods and AnalysisThis protocol was follows using the PRISMA-ScR guideline (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews), which was revised and approved by the research team. This study aims to identify factors and evidence of the physical, behavioural and mental consequences of sustained clinical practice in a continuing pandemic. Our research seeks to fill this gap in the literature, and the results may suggest to governments, healthcare authorities and healthcare providers appropriate measures to mitigate risks to healthcare workers during a pandemic response. Dissemination and ethicsThe current research design is based on the use of publicly available information and does not require ethical approval. The findings will be disseminated in conferences. Results will be published and additionally shared with relevant local and national authorities. Strengths and Limitations of the studyThis will be the first scoping review to identify factors and evidence of the physical, behavioural and mental consequences of sustained clinical practice in a continuing pandemic with health impacts for clinical staff. The search strategy includes six electronic databases with peer-reviewed literature, as well as a broad range of grey literature sources. Although this study will not require a quality appraisal, which is consistent with the framework proposed by Arksey and OMalley, the current study will formally assess the studies quality. This scoping review study has been registered with Open Science Framework to enhance its transparency. The search strategy proposed is broad, but the search strategy is limited to articles published in English, Spanish, Portuguese or Italian.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 96%
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 96%
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is artificial intelligence for medical professionals serving the patients? Protocol for a mixed method systematic review on patient-relevant benefits and harms of algorithmic decision-making 92%
- The Impact of Income Support Systems on Healthcare Quality and Functional Capacity in Workers with Low Back Pain: A Realist Review 92%
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 95%
- Interventions for burnout and well-being in homelessness staff: a systematic scoping review 95%
- Hospital at home: a systematic review of how medication management is conceptualised, described and implemented in practice – a study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Mental Illness Symptoms in Spain in the COVID-19 Crisis 93%
- One Year of Evidence on Mental Health in the COVID-19 Crisis - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 92%
- Artificial Intelligence Applications for COVID-19 in Intensive Care and Emergency Settings: A Systematic Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 91%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 91%
- A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.