Back

Prevalence of Occupation Associated with Increased Mobility During COVID-19 Pandemic

Shacham, E.; Scroggins, S.; Ellis, M.; Garza, A.

2021-01-21 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.12.11.20245357 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveIdentifying geographic-level prevalence of occupations associated with mobility during local stay-at-home pandemic mandate. MethodsA spatio-temporal ecological framework was applied to determine census-tracts that had significantly higher rates of occupations likely to be deemed essential: food-service, business and finance, healthcare support, and maintenance. Real-time mobility data was used to determine the average daily percent of residents not leaving their place of residence. Spatial regression models were constructed for each occupation proportion among census-tracts within a large urban area. ResultsAfter adjusting for demographics, results indicate census-tracts with higher proportion of food-service workers, healthcare support employees, and office administration staff are likely to have increased mobility. ConclusionsIncreased mobility among communities is likely to exacerbate COVID-19 mitigation efforts. This increase in mobility was also found associated with specific demographics suggesting it may be occurring among underserved and vulnerable populations. We find that prevalence of essential employment presents itself as a candidate for driving inequity in morbidity and mortality of COVID-19. Three-question SummaryO_LIEmployees and workers deemed essential during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to endure additional risk of infection due to community exposure. While preliminary reports are still quantifying this risk, we set out to examine if prevalence of specific occupations could be used to evaluate overall community-level risk based on stay-at-home mandate adherence. C_LIO_LIStudy results suggest that that not only are certain occupation geo-spatially associated with movement outside the home but are also associated with demographic characteristics likely to contribute to inequity of COVID-19 morbidity. C_LIO_LIOften, nuanced inequities are lost in the larger data samples, being able to identify possible inequities from other sources such as prevalence of occupation among communities, remains an important and applicable alternative. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
16.9%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.9%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
4
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.1%
6
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
7
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
9
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
11
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
12
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
28
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%