Back

Through The Back Door: Expiratory Accumulation of SARS-Cov-2 in the Olfactory Mucosa as Mechanism for CNS Penetration

Quadrio, M.; Pipolo, C.; Bulfamante, A. M.; Schillaci, A.; Banchetti, J.; Castellani, L.; Saibene, A. M.; Felisati, G.

2020-12-11 otolaryngology
10.1101/2020.12.09.20242396
Show abstract

IntroductionSARS-CoV-2 is a respiratory virus supposed to enter the organism through aerosol or fomite transmission to the nose, eyes and oropharynx. It is responsible for various clinical symptoms, including hyposmia and other neurological ones. Current literature suggests the olfactory mucosa as a port of entry to the CNS, but how the virus reaches the olfactory groove is still unknown. Because the first neurological symptoms of invasion (hyposmia) do not correspond to first signs of infection, the hypothesis of direct contact through airborne droplets during primary infection and therefore during inspiration is not plausible. The aim of this study is to evaluate if a secondary spread to the olfactory groove in a retrograde manner during expiration could be more probable. MethodsFour three-dimensional virtual models were obtained from actual CT scans and used to simulate expiratory droplets. The volume mesh consists of 25 million of cells, the simulated condition is a steady expiration, driving a flow rate of 270 ml/s, for a duration of 0.6 seconds. The droplet diameter is of 5 m. ResultsThe analysis of the simulations shows the virus to have a high probability to be deployed in the rhinopharynx, on the tail of medium and upper turbinates. The possibility for droplets to access the olfactory mucosa during the expiratory phase is lower than other nasal areas, but consistent. DiscussionThe data obtained from these simulations demonstrates the virus can be deployed in the olfactory groove during expiration. Even if the total amount in a single act is scarce, it must be considered it is repeated tens of thousands of times a day, and the source of contamination continuously acts on a timescale of several days. The present results also imply CNS penetration of SARS-CoV-2 through olfactory mucosa might be considered a complication and, consequently, prevention strategies should be considered in diseased patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 41%
12.5%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 9%
12.4%
3
Applied Sciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
11.1%
4
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
10.1%
5
Chemical Senses
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
5.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
4.5%
7
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 8%
2.4%
8
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 27%
2.3%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 8%
1.8%
10
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
11
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
1.6%
13
Sleep Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 0.8%
1.6%
14
Brain Sciences
based on 19 papers
Top 0.7%
1.6%
15
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 20%
1.3%
19
Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 18%
1.2%
21
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 6%
1.2%
22
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
23
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
24
Environmental Health Perspectives
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
25
JMIRx Med
based on 29 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
26
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 13%
0.8%
27
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 5%
0.7%