SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Saliva Rises Gradually and to Moderate Levels in Some Humans
Winnett, A.; Cooper, M. M.; Shelby, N.; Romano, A. E.; Reyes, J. A.; Ji, J.; Porter, M. K.; Savela, E. S.; Barlow, J. T.; Akana, R.; Tognazzini, C.; Feaster, M.; Goh, Y.-Y.; Ismagilov, R. F.
Show abstract
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in community settings often occurs before symptom onset, therefore testing strategies that can reliably detect people in the early phase of infection are urgently needed. Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection is especially critical to protect vulnerable populations who require frequent interactions with caretakers. Rapid COVID-19 tests have been proposed as an attractive strategy for surveillance, however a limitation of most rapid tests is their low sensitivity. Low-sensitivity tests are comparable to high sensitivity tests in detecting early infections when two assumptions are met: (1) viral load rises quickly (within hours) after infection and (2) viral load reaches and sustains high levels (>105- 106 RNA copies/mL). However, there are no human data testing these assumptions. In this study, we document a case of presymptomatic household transmission from a healthy young adult to a sibling and a parent. Participants prospectively provided twice-daily saliva samples. Samples were analyzed by RT-qPCR and RT-ddPCR and we measured the complete viral load profiles throughout the course of infection of the sibling and parent. This study provides evidence that in at least some human cases of SARS-CoV-2, viral load rises slowly (over days, not hours) and not to such high levels to be detectable reliably by any low-sensitivity test. Additional viral load profiles from different samples types across a broad demographic must be obtained to describe the early phase of infection and determine which testing strategies will be most effective for identifying SARS-CoV-2 infection before transmission can occur. One sentence summaryIn some human infections, SARS-CoV-2 viral load rises slowly (over days) and remains near the limit of detection of rapid, low-sensitivity tests.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Antigen-based testing but not real-time PCR correlates with SARS-CoV-2 virus culture 95%
- Performance of Repeat BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing in a Community Setting, Wisconsin, November-December 2020 94%
- High household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States: living density, viral load, and disproportionate impact on communities of color 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal assessment of diagnostic test performance over the course of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection 97%
- Screening for SARS-CoV-2 in close contacts of individuals with confirmed infection: performance and operational considerations 94%
- SARS-CoV-2 virus dynamics in recently infected people – data from a household transmission study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 viral-load curves in paired saliva and nasal swabs inform appropriate respiratory sampling site and analytical test sensitivity required for earliest viral detection 97%
- Pooled Saliva Specimens for SARS-CoV-2 Testing 96%
- Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in oral fluids 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine breakthrough infections reveal limited infectious virus shedding and restricted tissue distribution 96%
- A multidimensional cross-sectional analysis of COVID-19 seroprevalence among a police officer cohort: The PoliCOV-19 study 93%
- Evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab collection techniques for nucleic acid recovery and participant experience: recommendations for COVID-19 diagnostics 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid CRISPR-based surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic college students captures the leading edge of a community-wide outbreak 96%
- Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Testing across SARS-CoV-2 Variants 94%
- Adequacy of serial self-performed SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen-detection testing for longitudinal mass screening in the workplace 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.