Back

A machine learning framework to detect syncope using the active stand

Carmody, M.; Finucane, C.; Nolan, H.; O'Dwyer, C.; Kwok, M.; Kenny, R. A.; Fan, C. W.

2020-12-08 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.12.07.20245159 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most common form of syncope, accounting for 50-60% of unexplained syncope. Currently diagnosis is achieved via clinical assessment combined with the Head-Up Tilt Test (HUT). AimTo examine the utility of the active stand test (AS) to identify those with a positive HUT or diagnosis of VVS. DesignRetrospective study of hemodynamic responses to AS. MethodsContinuous blood pressure responses to AS from 101 patients attending a Falls and Blackouts Unit were acquired, including: 37 controls (CON), 64 with a clinical diagnosis of VVS (VVS+) (34 tilt-positive (HUT+) and 30 tilt-negative (HUT-)) with a mean age of 25 {+/-} 9 years. A total of 33 hemodynamic features were extracted with a subset of these entered into linear discriminant classifier. Classification accuracy was assessed using N-fold cross-validation. ResultsResults indicated that it was possible to classify the outcome of the HUT with sensitivity of 58.8%, specificity of 63.3% and an accuracy of 60.9%. Using a multivariate classifier it was possible to identify those with a positive diagnosis of VVS with a sensitivity of 84.3%, specificity of 72.9% and an accuracy of 80.2%. ConclusionThis study highlights the existence of a unique AS hemodynamic response characterised by autonomic hypersensitivity exhibited by young patients prone to VVS which is detectable using a multi-parameter machine learning framework. With further verification, this approach may have applications in syncope and falls diagnosis, population studies and the tracking of treatment efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.