Back

Theoretical Epidemic Laws Based on Data of COVID-19 Pandemic

Guo, J.

2020-12-09 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.12.07.20238253 medRxiv
Show abstract

The standard growth model of epidemic evolution such as the Richards generalized logistic function is remarkably successful because it agrees with almost all previous epidemic data. Yet, it fails to explain intervention measures for mitigations of the ongoing coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic. It also fails to replicate an endemic phase that occurs in many countries epidemic curves (time series data of daily new cases). These discrepancies demonstrate that new epidemic laws are required to understand, predict and mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we show that almost all COVID-19 evolution can be modeled by three innovative epidemic laws. Specifically, based on the world COVID-19 data, we first divide an epidemic curve into three phases: an exponential growth phase, an exponential decay phase, and a constant endemic phase. We next integrate the growth and the decay phases into the first epidemic law with interventions as a model parameter. This law is completely opposite to the Richards generalized logistic function in terms of intervention measures. We then combine the first epidemic law with the endemic phase to form the second epidemic law, which makes the curve of cumulative cases increase linearly as time tends to infinity. The third epidemic law states if an epidemic is composed of multiple epidemic waves, the superposition principle applies. These laws were confirmed by the COVID-19 data from 18 countries including undeveloped, developing and developed countries. Finally, we pave the way for future research to incorporate the proposed theory into the classic SIR model. We anticipate that the results from this research can provide a scientific base for governments to mitigate the COVID-19 and other epidemic disasters.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Infectious Disease Modelling
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
2
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
3
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
5
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
8
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
12
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
13
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
14
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
15
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
16
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
17
Frontiers in Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
19
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
21
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
25
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
27
Quantitative Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%