Back

A 6-mRNA host response whole-blood classifier trained using patients with non-COVID-19 viral infections accurately predicts severity of COVID-19

Buturovic, L.; Zheng, H.; Tang, B.; Lai, K.; Kuan, W. S.; Gillett, M.; Santram, R.; Shojaei, M.; Almansa, R.; Nieto, J. A.; Munoz, S.; Herrero, C.; Antonakos, N.; Koufargyris, P.; Kontogiorgi, M.; Damoraki, G.; Liesenfeld, O.; Wacker, J.; Midic, U.; Luethy, R.; Rawling, D.; Remmel, M.; Coyle, S.; Liu, Y.; Rao, A. M.; Dermadi, D.; Toh, J.; Jones, L. M.; Donato, M.; Khatri, P.; Giamarellos-Bourboulis, E. J.; Sweeney, T. E.

2020-12-08 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2020.12.07.20230235 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDetermining the severity of COVID-19 remains an unmet medical need. Our objective was to develop a blood-based host-gene-expression classifier for the severity of viral infections and validate it in independent data, including COVID-19. MethodsWe developed the classifier for the severity of viral infections and validated it in multiple viral infection settings including COVID-19. We used training data (N=705) from 21 retrospective transcriptomic clinical studies of influenza and other viral illnesses looking at a preselected panel of host immune response messenger RNAs. ResultsWe selected 6 host RNAs and trained logistic regression classifier with a cross-validation area under curve of 0.90 for predicting 30-day mortality in viral illnesses. Next, in 1,417 samples across 21 independent retrospective cohorts the locked 6-RNA classifier had an area under curve of 0.91 for discriminating patients with severe vs. non-severe infection. Next, in independent cohorts of prospectively (N=97) and retrospectively (N=100) enrolled patients with confirmed COVID-19, the classifier had an area under curve of 0.89 and 0.87, respectively, for identifying patients with severe respiratory failure or 30-day mortality. Finally, we developed a loop-mediated isothermal gene expression assay for the 6-messenger-RNA panel to facilitate implementation as a rapid assay. ConclusionsWith further study, the classifier could assist in the risk assessment of COVID-19 and other acute viral infections patients to determine severity and level of care, thereby improving patient management and reducing healthcare burden.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
2
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
4
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
21
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
22
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
23
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
26
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%