What is the probability that this patient, who presents to a UK hospital, will be diagnosed with Covid-19? Prospective validation of the open-source CovidCalculatorUK resource.
Chapman, G. A.; Mundell, L.; Harrison, C. H.; Cargill, T.; Keating, O.; Johnson, M.; Smith, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2 and the associated disease, Covid-19, continue to pose a global health threat. The CovidCalculatorUK is an open-source online tool (covidcalculatoruk.org) that estimates the probability that an individual patient, who presents to a UK hospital, will later test positive for SARS-CoV2. The objective is to aid cohorting decisions and minimise nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV2. MethodsThis n = 500 prospective, observational, multicentre, validation study compared the CovidCalculatorUKs estimated probability of Covid-19 with the first SARS-CoV2 oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab result for individual patients admitted to hospital during the study period (01.04.20 - 18.05.20). A comparison with senior clinicians estimates of the probability of Covid-19 was also made. ResultsPatients who were prospectively grouped, by the CovidCalculatorUK, into 0-30% estimated probability, 30-60% and 60-100% estimated probability went on to have first swab SARS-CoV2 positive results in: 15.7%, 30.5% and 61.9% of cases, respectively. CovidCalculatorUK performance demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.76 (95% CI 0.71 - 0.81) (p < 0.001). Senior clinician stratification of the estimated probability of Covid-19 performed similarly to the CovidCalculatorUK. ConclusionThe CovidCalculatorUK provides a reasonably accurate estimate of the probability of an individual testing positive on their first SARS-CoV2 nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The CovidCalculatorUK output performs similarly to a senior clinicians estimate. Further evolution of the calculator may improve performance.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 95%
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 95%
- First and second SARS-CoV-2 waves in inner London: A comparison of admission characteristics and the impact of the B.1.1.7 variant 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 96%
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 94%
- Real-world evaluation of AI-driven COVID-19 triage for emergency admissions: External validation & operational assessment of lab-free and high-throughput screening solutions 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- LMIC-PRIEST: Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19 in a middle-income setting 95%
- Clinical prediction rule for SARS-CoV-2 infection from 116 U.S. emergency departments 94%
- Predicting patients with false negative SARS-CoV-2 testing at hospital admission: A retrospective multi-center study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Title: Risk factors for severe disease in patients admitted with COVID-19 to a hospital in London, England: a retrospective cohort study 93%
- Identifying COVID-19 cases in primary care settings 92%
- Contact patterns before and during the UK’s Autumn 2020 COVID-19 lockdown among university students and staff 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG in healthcare workers and other staff at North Bristol NHS Trust: a sociodemographic analysis 94%
- Healthcare-associated COVID-19 in England: a national data linkage study 92%
- Identifying optimal combinations of symptoms to trigger diagnostic work-up of suspected COVID-19 cases in vaccine trials: analysis from a community-based, prospective, observational cohort 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.