Back

Combined effect of crop rotation and carabid beetles on weed dynamics in arable fields

Schmucki, R.; Bohan, D. A.; Pocock, M. J. O.

2020-12-04 ecology
10.1101/2020.12.04.411918 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Weed management is a resource-intensive practice in arable agriculture, with direct and long-term impacts on both productivity and biodiversity (e.g. plant, pollinators and farmland wildlife). In conventional systems, weed control relies on crop management and herbicide inputs, but for more sustainable production systems, use of herbicides needs to be reduced. This requires a good understanding of the processes that regulate arable weed dynamics in arable fields. We adopted a systems framework to understand and model interacting components that drive the weed dynamics in 168 arable fields. Within this framework, we built a structural equation model (SEM) to quantify the direct and indirect effects of crop rotation (i.e. crops in the previous three years and the current year) and carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) on weed density, seed abundance and accumulation in the seedbank. We included results from a mechanistic approach to infer interactions between seed-feeding carabid beetles and seeds to estimate predation pressure in each field. Our results show that weeds in arable fields are regulated by crop type, sowing season, and activity density of carabid beetles. We found a direct effect of crop rotation, including both past and current field management practice, on weed abundance in the field and its seedbank. There was also an indirect effect of crops on weed seed accumulation in the seedbank via the effect of seed-eating carabid beetles. The efficiency of weed control by carabid beetles depended on the cumulative predation pressure, which indicates the importance of functional diversity as well as abundance. Farmers and agronomists can capitalise on the ecosystem services provided by carabid beetles by adapting agronomic practices and crop rotation to maintain a rich fauna of seed-eating carabids in fields and potentially across the agricultural landscapes. When integrated with rotational management practices, this ecosystem services can improve the efficiency of weed management and contribute to the sustainability of cropping systems.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.4%
3
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
6
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
9
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
25
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%