Protocol for longitudinal assessment of SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in healthcare professionals in Hannover, Germa-ny: the prospective, longitudinal, observational COVID-19 Contact (CoCo) study
Jablonka, A.; Happle, C.; Cossmann, A.; Strankov, M. V.; Zychlinsky Scharff, A.; Ernst, D.; Behrens, G. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundDuring the current pandemic, healthcare professionals (HCP) have been at the frontline of the crisis. Serological screening may help in identifying severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) prevalence. However, given the rapidly evolving situation in spring 2020, many questions regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection risk and utility of serological testing remained unanswered. To address these questions, we initiated the COVID-19 Contact (CoCo) study at Hannover Medical School, a large university hospital in Northern Germany and affiliated care providers. MethodsThe CoCo study is an ongoing, prospective, longitudinal, observational study in HCP and individuals with potential contact to SARS-CoV-2. It monitors anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin serum levels and collects information on symptoms of respiratory infection, work and home environment, and self-perceived SARS-CoV-2 infection risk. Inclusion criteria are (1) working as HCP in clinical care at our university centre, affiliated hospitals or private practices, (2) written informed consent and (3) age >18 years. Exclusion criteria are (1) refusal to give informed consent and (2) contraindication to venepuncture. Study participants are asked to provide weekly to six-monthly samples (7.5 ml serum and 7.5 ml EDTA blood) and fill out a questionnaire. Since March 2020, around 1250 HCP have been included in the study. At each study visit, sera are screened for anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein 1 (S1) immunoglobulin G (IgG) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Positive or borderline positive samples are re-assessed with an alternative serological test. Individual results for each study participant are made available online via a dedicated study website. This study also aims to compare different serological testing assays, as well as explore further humoral and cellular immune markers. Study protocols are continually adapted to the rapidly evolving situation of the current pandemic. DiscussionThis ongoing prospective study will aim to answer central questions on the prevalence and kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2-humoral immune responses and the validity of serological testing of HCP in a region with high healthcare standard and comparatively low COVID-19 prevalence. As such, our results are highly relevant to other regions and may support HCP around the world in managing this unprecedented situation. Trial registrationGerman Clinical Trial Registry, DRKS00021152. Registered 4th April 2020 -retrospectively registered, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00021152 Protocol summary O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1066beborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9734b4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1052a3dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@183b87org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ec4318_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL C_TBL
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 serostatus of healthcare worker in the Austrian state Vorarlberg between June 2020 and January 2021 95%
- The Specchio-COVID19 cohort study: a longitudinal follow-up of SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey participants in the canton of Geneva, Switzerland (Study protocol) 95%
- Prevalence and Incidence of Antibodies Against Sars-Cov-2 Among Primary Healthcare Providers in Belgium During One Year of the Covid-19 Epidemic: Prospective Cohort Study Protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID HOME study research protocol: Prospective cohort study of non-hospitalised COVID-19 patients 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 antibody persistence after five and twelve months: A cohort study from South-Eastern Norway 95%
- Prevalence of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare workers in a tertiary pediatric hospital in Poland 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 Exposures of Healthcare Workers from Primary Care, Long-Term Care Facilities and Hospitals: A Nationwide Matched Case-Control Study 94%
- Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests 94%
- Non-occupational and occupational factors associated with specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Hospital Workers – a multicentre cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Salivary detection of COVID-19. Clinical performance of oral sponge sampling for SARS-CoV-2 testing 94%
- COVID-PCD – a participatory research study on the impact of COVID-19 in people with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia 92%
- Symptoms persisting after hospitalization for COVID-19: 12 months interim results of the COFLOW study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.