Back

No evidence for whole-chromosome dosage compensation or global transcriptomic expression differences in spontaneously-aneuploid mutation accumulation lines of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

McQueary, H. C.; Behringer, M. G.; Chamberlin, J.; Tsfoni, A.; Canas, A.; Demario, S.; Johnson, B. S.; Hall, D. W.

2020-12-02 genetics
10.1101/2020.12.01.404830 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aneuploidy, the state in which an organisms genome contains one or more missing or additional chromosomes, often causes widespread genotypic and phenotypic effects. Most often, aneuploidies are deleterious; the most common examples in humans being Downs syndrome (Trisomy 21) and Turners syndrome (monosomy X). However, aneuploidy is surprisingly common in wild yeast populations. In recent years, there has been debate as to whether yeast contain an innate dosage compensation response that operates at the gene, chromosome, or the whole-genome level, or if natural isolates are robust to aneuploidy without such a mechanism. In this study, we tested for differential gene expression in 20 aneuploid and 16 euploid lines of yeast from two previous mutation accumulation experiments, where selection was minimized and therefore aneuploidies arose spontaneously. We found no evidence for whole-chromosome dosage compensation in aneuploid yeast but did find some evidence for attenuation of expression on a gene-by-gene basis. We additionally found that aneuploidy has no effect on the expression of the rest of the genome (i.e. "trans" genes), and that very few mutually exclusive aneuploid lines shared differentially expressed genes. However, we found there was a small set of genes that exhibited a shared expression response in the euploid lines, suggesting an effect of mutation accumulation on gene expression. Our findings contribute to our understanding of aneuploidy in yeast and support the hypothesis that there is no innate dosage compensation mechanism at the whole-chromosome level.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.