Back

A pipeline to characterize local cortical folds by mapping them to human-interpretable shapes

Roy, A.; McMillen, T.; Beiler, D. L.; Snyder, W.; Patti, M.; Troiani, V.

2020-11-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.11.25.388785 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVariations in regional cortical folds across individuals have been examined using computationally-derived morphological measures, or by manual characterization procedures that map distinct variants of a regional fold to a set of human-interpretable shapes. Although manual mapping approaches have proven useful for identifying morphological differences of clinical relevance, such procedures are subjective and not amenable to scaling. New MethodWe propose a 3-step pipeline to develop computational models of manual mapping. The steps are: represent regional folds as feature vectors, manually map each feature vector to a shape-variant that the underlying fold represents, and train classifiers to learn the mapping. ResultsFor demonstration, we chose a 2D-problem of detecting within slice discontinuity of medial and lateral sulci of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC); the discontinuity may be visualized as a broken H-shaped pattern, and is fundamental to OFC-type-characterization. The classifiers predicted discontinuities with 86-95% test-accuracy. Comparison with Existing MethodsThere is no existing pipeline that automates a manual characterization process. For the current demonstration problem, we conduct multiple analyses using existing softwares to explain our design decisions, and present guidelines for using the pipeline to examine other regional folds using conventional or non-conventional morphometric measures. ConclusionWe show that this pipeline can be useful for determining axial-slice discontinuity of sulci in the OFC and can learn structural-features that human-raters may rely on during manual-characterization.The pipeline can be used for examining other regional folds and may facilitate discovery of various statistically-reliable 2D or 3D human-interpretable shapes that are embedded throughout the brain.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
4
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Brain Imaging and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
21
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
30
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%