Statistical Analyses of the Public Health and Economic Performance of Nordic Countries in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Gordon, D.; Grafton, R. Q.; Steinshamn, S. I.
Show abstract
AimTo compare trends and undertake statistical analyses of differences in public health performance (confirmed cases and fatalities) of Nordic countries; Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, and New Zealand, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsPer capita trends in total cases and per capita fatalities were analysed and difference-in-difference statistical tests undertaken to assess whether differences in stringency of mandated social distancing (SD) measures, testing rates and border closures explain cross-country differences. ResultsSweden is a statistical outlier, relative to its Nordic neighbours, for both per capita cases and per capita fatalities associated with COVID-19 but not in terms of the reduction in economic growth. Swedens public health differences, compared to its Nordic neigbours, are partially explained by differences in terms of international border closures and the level of stringency of SD measures (including testing) implemented from early March to June 2020. ConclusionsWe find that: one, early imposition of full international travel restrictions combined with high levels of government-mandated stringency of SD reduced the per capita cases and per capita fatalities associated with COVID-19 in 2020 in the selected countries and, two, in Nordic countries, less stringent government-mandated SD is not associated with higher quarterly economic growth.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Breakpoint modelling of temporal associations between non-pharmaceutical interventions and the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 in the Republic of Ireland 94%
- Compliance with Covid-19 measures: evidence from New Zealand 93%
- Recommended distances for physical distancing during COVID-19 pandemics reveal cultural connections between countries 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Healthcare costs and benefits of the UK’s Covid-19 response with four European countries: Decision Modelling Study 93%
- Comparing SARS-CoV-2 case rates between pupils, teachers and the general population: results from Germany 92%
- Excess mortality across regions of Europe during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic – impact of the winter holiday travelling and government responses 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and deaths: cross-national natural experiment in 32 European countries 95%
- The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on early Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries 95%
- COVID-19 infections in day care centres in Germany: Social and organisational determinants of infections in children and staff in the second and third wave of the pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Will the COVID-19 pandemic lead to a tsunami of suicides? A Swedish nationwide analysis of historical and 2020 data 94%
- A Deep Recurrent Reinforced Learning model to compare the efficacy of targeted local vs. national measures on the spread of COVID-19 in the UK 93%
- Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the United Kingdom, Italy and Slovenia 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.