Using Machine-Learning Techniques to Identify Responders vs. Non-responders in Randomized Clinical Trials.
Nikolodimou, V.; Agapow, P.
Show abstract
Despite the expectation of heterogeneity in therapy outcomes, especially for complex diseases like cancer, analyzing differential response to experimental therapies in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) setting is typically done by dividing patients into responders and non-responders, usually based on a single endpoint. Given the existence of biological and patho-physiological differences among metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, we hypothesized that a data-driven analysis of an RCT population outcomes can identify sub-types of patients founded on differential response to Panitumumab - a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor. Outcome and response data of the RCT population were mined with heuristic, distance-based and model-based unsupervised clustering algorithms. The population sub-groups obtained by the best performing clustering approach were then examined in terms of molecular and clinical characteristics. The utility of this characterization was compared against that of the sub-groups obtained by the conventional responders analysis and then contrasted with aetiological evidence around mCRC heterogeneity and biological functioning. The Partition around Medoids clustering method results into the identification of seven sub-types of patients, statistically distinct from each other in survival outcomes, prognostic biomarkers and genetic characteristics. Conventional responders analysis was proven inferior in uncovering relationships between physical, clinical history, genetic attributes and differential treatment resistance mechanisms. Combined with improved characterization of the molecular subtypes of CRC, applying Machine Learning techniques, like unsupervised clustering, onto the wealth of data already collected by previous RCTs can support the design of further targeted, more efficient RCTs and better identification of patient groups who will respond to a given intervention.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 93%
- A distinct four-value blood signature of pyrexia under combination therapy of malignant melanoma with BRAF/MEK-inhibitors evidenced by an algorithm-defined pyrexia score 93%
- Using numerical modelling and simulation to assess the ethical burden in clinical trials and how it relates to the proportion of responders in a trial sample 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 94%
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 93%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing randomized trial designs to estimate treatment effect in rare diseases with longitudinal models: a simulation study showcased by Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxias using the SARA score 92%
- KMSubtraction: Reconstruction of unreported subgroup survival data utilizing published Kaplan-Meier survival curves 91%
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning for prediction of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer from simple clinical and biological data 93%
- Use of high-plex data reveals novel insights into the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma 93%
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.