Back

Community prevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and correlates of protective immunity in five localities in an Indian metropolitan city

Ghose, A.; Bhattacharya, S.; Karthikeyan, A. S.; Kudale, A. M.; Monteiro, J. M.; Joshi, A.; Medigeshi, G. R.; Kang, G.; Bal, V.; Rath, S.; Shashidhara, L. S.; John, J.; Chaudhuri, S.; Nagarkar, A.

2020-11-18 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.11.17.20228155 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo assess seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a densely populated urban Indian settings and its implications for disease trends and protective immunity. DesignCross-sectional sero-epidemiological survey linked with administrative reporting of COVID-19 testing data. SettingsPune city in western India Main outcome measurePrevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies were estimated and along with correlates of virus neutralisation and other immune and inflammatory markers. ResultsSeropositivity was extensive (51{middle dot}3%; 95%CI 39{middle dot}9 to 62{middle dot}4) but varied widely in the five localities tested, ranging from 35{middle dot}8% to 66{middle dot}4%. Seropositivity was higher in crowded living conditions in the slums (OR 1{middle dot}91), and was lower in those 65 years or older (OR 0{middle dot}59). The infection-fatality ratio was estimated at 0.21%. Post survey, COVID-19 incidence was lower in areas noted to have higher seroprevalence. Substantial virus-neutralising activity was observed in seropositive individuals, but with considerable heterogeneity in the immune response and possible age-dependent diversity in the antibody repertoire. ConclusionDespite crowded living conditions having facilitated widespread transmission, the variability in seroprevalence in localities that are in geographical proximity indicates a heterogenous spread of infection. Declining infection rates in areas with high seropositivity suggest population-level protection. It is also supported by substantial neutralising activity in asymptomatically infected individuals. This is the first report of a significantly high proportion of protective immune response among asymptomatic individuals in the population. The heterogeneity in antibody levels and neutralisation capacity indicates the existence of immunological sub-groups of functional interest. Trial registrationRegistered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2020/07/026509)

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
5
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
7
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
9
IJID Regions
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.9%
11
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
16
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%