Removing weekly administrative noise in the daily count of COVID-19 new cases. Application to the computation of Rt
Alvarez, L.; Colom, M.; Morel, J.-M.
Show abstract
The way each country counts and reports the incident cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections is strongly affected by the "weekend effect". During the weekend, fewer tests are carried out and there is a delay in the registration of cases. This introduces an "administrative noise" that can strongly disturb the calculation of trend estimators such as the effective reproduction number R(t). In this work we propose a procedure to correct the incidence curve and obtain a better fit between the number of infected and the one expected using the renewal equation. The classic way to deal with the administrative noise is to invoke its weekly period and therefore to filter the incidence curve by a seven days sliding mean. Yet this has three drawbacks: the first one is a loss of resolution. The second one is that a 7-day mean filter hinders the estimate of the effective reproduction number R(t) in the last three days before present. The third drawback of a mean filter is that it implicitly assumes the administrative noise to be additive and time invariant. The present study supports the idea that the administrative is better dealt with as being both periodic and multiplicative. The simple method that derives from these assumptions amount to multiplying the number of infected by a correcting factor which depends on the day of the week. This correcting factor is estimated from the incidence curve itself. The validity of the method is demonstrated by its positive impact on the accuracy of an the estimates of R(t). To exemplify the advantages of the multiplicative periodic correction, we apply it to Sweden, Germany, France and Spain. We observe that the estimated administrative noise is country dependent, and that the proposed strategy manages to reduce it noise considerably. An implementation of this technique is available at www.ipol.im/ern, where it can be tested on the daily incidence curves of an extensive list of states and geographic areas provided by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing Two Outbreak Waves of COVID-19 in Spain Using Phenomenological Epidemic Modelling 98%
- Prediction of Covid-19 spreading and optimal coordination of counter-measures: From microscopic to macroscopic models to Pareto fronts 96%
- Current forecast of COVID-19: a Bayesian and Machine Learning approaches 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Burr distribution as a model for the delay between key events in an individual’s infection history 95%
- A mechanistic and data-driven reconstruction of the time-varying reproduction number: Application to the COVID-19 epidemic 95%
- Estimation of heterogeneous instantaneous reproduction numbers with application to characterize SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Massachusetts counties 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- What can we learn from COVID-19 data by using epidemic models with unidentified infectious cases? 96%
- Modelling lockdown measures in epidemic outbreaks using selective socio-economic containment with uncertainty 95%
- A Machine Learning Approach to Differentiate Between COVID-19 and Influenza Infection Using Synthetic Infection and Immune Response Data 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.