Back

A Proof of Concept for a Systems Approach to Biologically Characterize the Maternal Gut Microbiome, Immune Patterns and Mental Distress During Pregnancy

Penalver Bernabe, B.; Cunningham, J. L.; Tussing-Humphreys, L.; Carroll, I.; Meltzer-Brody, S.; Maki, P. M.; Gilbert, J. A.; Kimmel, M.

2020-11-18 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2020.11.15.20232173 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceScreening for anxiety and depression is important but especially difficult during pregnancy. Identification and quantification of the variation of maternal biologic dimensions during the dynamic pregnancy period, e.g. immune and microbiome profiles, have the potential to greatly improve mental heath screening and patient stratification. ObjectiveTo determine if specific immune and microbiome profiles align with features of mental distress during pregnancy. DesignProspective case-control study from two cohorts in US followed from 2017 to 2019 in the second and third trimesters. SettingFor the urban cohort, recruitment from an obstetric clinic; for the suburbian group, recruitment from advertisements in the hospital and surrounding communities. ParticipantsA total of 90 pregnant women from two distinct geographic regions, with contrasting race, age, marital status, education and urban vs suburban settings. ExposuresSelf-reported mental health symptoms (anxiety, preceptions of stress and depression) and sociodemographic characteristics; blood was obtained for cytokine profiles and stool for microbiota analysis. Main Outcomes and MeasuresDimensionality reduction clustered the symptom scores from the three self-report tools. Phenotypes based on these features were then defined. ResultsFactor analysis revealed four features: Burn-out, Low Self-Esteem, Mixed State, and Suicidal/Self-Harm; six phenotypes: severe, with and without suicidal thoughts, depressed with low self-steem, hyperactive, and healthy. Factors and phenotype groups were statistically associated with immune and microbiota profiles and sociodemography. The hyperactive phenotype, despite having low self-reported symptoms, had elevated inflammatory cytokines and a microbiota profile similar to the severe phenotype. Elevated T-helper cell 17 (Th17), inducer of inflammation, is related to anxiety in these cohorts. Variance in socioeconomic factors and and the gut microbiota profile can account for 50% of the variance in phenotype. ConclusionBetter stratification of biological charateristics is essential for understanding complex perinatal mental disorders and can be achieved by including microbiota and immune data. Our preliminary results suggest that variance in microbial and immune factors can describe differences in mental health phenotype, and could be predictive of the womens current or future risk for future diagnosis. These findings form testable hypotheses for larger longitudinal studies. KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDoes self-reported mental distress in late pregnancy align with specific immune and microbiome patterns? FindingsWe show potential limitations in sole reliance on self-reported symptoms of mental distress in 90 subjects from two prospective cohorts. The most different groups based on symptom-based factors presented statistically similar inflammation and microbiome profiles that may reflect underreporting of mental distress symptoms. MeaningA systems biology approach identified risk immune and microbiome profiles with potential advantages to augment self-report. These biological charateristics high risk for mental distress in pregnancy should be confirmed in larger cohorts and may improve understanding of perinatal mood disorders.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
3
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
5
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
9
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
10
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Psychoneuroendocrinology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
14
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
16
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
18
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
25
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%