Back

Assessment of the Impacts of Pharmaceutical and Non-pharmaceutical Intervention on COVID-19 in South Africa Using Mathematical Model

Musa, R.; Ezugwu, A. E.; Mbah, G. C.

2020-11-16 health informatics
10.1101/2020.11.13.20231159 medRxiv
Show abstract

The novel coronal virus has spread across more than 213 countries within the space of six months causing devastating public health hazard and monumental economic loss. In the absence of clinically approved pharmaceutical intervention, attentions are shifted to non-pharmaceutical controls to mitigate the burden of the novel pandemic. In this regard, a ten mutually exclusive compartmental mathematical model is developed to investigate possible effects of both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical controls incorporating both private and governments quarantine and treatments. Several reproduction numbers were calculated and used to determine the impact of both control measures as well as projected benefits of social distancing, treatments and vaccination. We investigate and compare the possible impact of social distancing incorporating different levels of vaccination, with vaccination programme incorporating different levels of treatment. Using the officially published South African COVID-19 data, the numerical simulation shows that the community reproduction threshold will be 30 when there is no social distancing but will drastically reduced to 5 (about 83% reduction) when social distancing is enforced. Furthermore, when there is vaccination with perfect efficacy, the community reproduction threshold will be 4 which increases to 12 (about 67% increment) with-out vaccination. We also established that the implementation of both interventions is enough to curtail the spread of COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa which is in confirmation with the recommendation of the world health organization.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
2
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
8.3%
5
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
6
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
9
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
COVID
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
12
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
14
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%