Back

Google Searches for Taste and Smell Loss Anticipate Covid-19 Epidemiology

Lippi, G.; Henry, B. M.; Mattiuzzi, C.; Sanchis-Gomar, F.

2020-11-12 public and global health
10.1101/2020.11.09.20228510 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAs evidence emerged that loss of taste and/or loss of smell is frequently triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we investigated whether Google searches volume for these two disease-specific symptoms could be associated with disease epidemiology in United States (US). Materials and MethodsWe performed an electronic search in Google Trends using the keywords "taste loss" and "smell loss" within the US. The Google searches volume was correlated with the number of new weekly cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the country. ResultsThe weekly Google searches for taste and smell loss exhibited a trend similar to that of new weekly SARS-CoV-2 infections in the US. A nearly perfect correlation was found between Google Trends scores of taste and smell loss (r=0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; p<0.001). Although a significant association was found between Google searches for the two symptoms and the concomitant number of new weekly SARS-CoV-2 infections reported during the same week, the correlation improved over time. The highest correlation was found comparing Google Trends scores for taste or smell loss and the number of new weekly SARS-CoV-2 infections two weeks later. The correlation coefficient of summing Google Trends scores for the two symptoms and the number of new weekly SARS-CoV-2 infections two weeks later was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68-0.90; p<0.001), and was associated 0.89 diagnostic accuracy. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that Google searches numbers for olfactory and gustatory dysfunctions may help predicting the epidemiological trajectory of COVID-19 early before official reporting.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
8
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
11
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
13
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
16
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
17
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%