Back

Micromechanical homogenisation of a hydrogel-filled electrospun scaffold for tissue-engineered epicardial patching of the infarcted heart

Abdalrahman, T.; Mandel, N.; Sack, K. L.; Pugno, N. M.; Bezuidenhout, D.; Limbert, G.; Moscato, F.; Davies, N. H.; Franz, T.

2020-11-08 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.11.08.373209 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study aimed at developing a formulation to link microscopic structure and macroscopic mechanics of a fibrous scaffold filled with a hydrogel for use as a tissue-engineered patch for local epicardial support of the infarcted heart. Mori-Tanaka mean field homogenisation, closed-cell foam mechanics and finite element (FE) methods were used to represent the macroscopic elastic modulus of the filled fibrous scaffold. The homogenised constitutive description of the scaffold was implemented for an epicardial patch in a FE model of a human cardiac left ventricle (LV) to assess effects of patching on myocardial mechanics and ventricular function in presences of an infarct. The macroscopic elastic modulus of the scaffold was predicted to be 0.287 MPa with the FE method and 0.290 MPa with the closed-cell model for the realistic fibre structure of the scaffold, and 0.108 and 0.540 MPa with mean field homogenization for randomly oriented and completely aligned fibres. Epicardial patching was predicted to reduce maximum myocardial stress in the infarcted LV from 19 kPa (no patch) to 9.5 kPa (patch), and to increase the ventricular ejection fraction from 40% (no patch) to 43% (patch). The predictions of the macroscopic elastic modulus of the realistic scaffold with the FE and the closed-cell model agreed well, and were bound by the mean field homogenisation prediction for random and fully aligned fibre orientation of the scaffold. This study demonstrates the feasibility of homogenization techniques to represent complex multiscale structural features in an simplified but meaningful manner.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.0%
2
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
6
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
7
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
10
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
12
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
14
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%