State- and County-Level COVID-19 Public Health Orders in California: Constructing a Dataset and Describing Their Timing, Content, and Stricture
Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D.; Holsinger, A. F.; Holsinger, E.; Long, E.; SC-COSMO Modeling Consortium,
Show abstract
Without vaccines, non-pharmaceutical interventions have been the most widely used approach to controlling the spread of COVID-19 epidemics. Various jurisdictions have implemented public health orders as a means of reducing effective contacts and controlling their local epidemics. Multiple studies have examined the effectiveness of various orders (e.g. use of face masks) for epidemic control. However, orders occur at different timings across jurisdictions and some orders on the same topic are stricter than others. We constructed a county-level longitudinal data set of more than 2,400 public health orders issues by California and its 58 counties pertaining to its 40 million residents. First, we describe methods used to construct the dataset that enables the characterization of the evolution over time of California state- and county-level public health orders dealing with COVID-19 from January 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. Public health orders are both an interesting and important outcome in their own right and also a key input into analyses looking at how such orders may impact COVID-19 epidemics. To construct the dataset, we developed and executed a search strategy to identify COVID-19 public health orders over this time period for all relevant jurisdictions. We characterized each identified public health order in terms of the timing of when it was announced, went into effect and (potentially) expired. We also adapted an existing schema to describe the topic(s) each public health order dealt with and the level of stricture each imposed, applying it to all identified orders. Finally, as an initial assessment, we examined the patterns of public health orders within and across counties, focusing on the timing of orders, the rate of increase and decrease in stricture, and on variation and convergence of orders within regions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliability of COVID-19 data: An evaluation and reflection 94%
- The COVID-19 health equity twindemic: Statewide epidemiologic trends of SARS-CoV-2 outcomes among racial minorities and in rural America 92%
- Causes, characteristics, and patterns of prolonged unplanned school closures prior to the COVID-19 pandemic – United States, 2011 – 2019 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 92%
- Phased implementation of COVID-19 vaccination: rapid assessment of policy adoption, reach and effectiveness to protect the most vulnerable in the US 91%
- Knowledge and practices towards COVID-19 during its outbreak: a multinational cross-sectional study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Potential and Policy Changes in South Carolina, February 2020 – January 2021 94%
- Late surges in COVID-19 cases and varying transmission potential partially due to public health policy changes in 5 Western states, March 10, 2020-January 10, 2021 93%
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementing Select Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Reduce the Transmission of Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2019 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Recurrent Reinforced Learning model to compare the efficacy of targeted local vs. national measures on the spread of COVID-19 in the UK 90%
- COVID-19 outbreak rates and infection attack rates associated with the workplace: a descriptive epidemiological study 89%
- Protocol for the PATHOME Study: A Cohort Study on Urban Societal Development and the Ecology of Enteric Disease Transmission among Infants, Domestic Animals, and the Environment 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.