Two decades of creating drought tolerant maize and underpinning prediction technologies in the US corn-belt: Review and perspectives on the future of crop design
Messina, C.; Cooper, M.; Hammer, G.; Berning, D.; Ciampitti, I.; Clark, R.; Diepenbrock, C. H.; Gho, C.; Jines, M.; Lee, T.; McCormick, R. F.; Mihura, E.; Podlich, D.; Rotundo, J.; Smalley, M.; Tang, T.; Truong, S.; van Eeuwijk, F.
Show abstract
Over the last decade, society witnessed the largest expansion of agricultural land planted with drought tolerant (DT) maize (Zea mays L.) Dedicated efforts to drought breeding led to development of DT maize. Here we show that after two decades of sustained breeding efforts the rate of crop improvement under drought is in the range 1.0-1.6% yr-1, which is higher than rates (0.7% yr-1) reported prior to drought breeding. Prediction technologies that leverage biological understanding and statistical learning to improve upon the quantitative genetics framework will further accelerate genetic gain. A review of published and unpublished analyses conducted on data including 138 breeding populations and 93 environments between 2009 and 2019 demonstrated an average prediction skill (r) improvement around 0.2. These methods applied to pre-commercial stages showed accuracies higher that current statistical approaches (0.85 vs. 0.70). Improvement in hybrid and management choice can increase water productivity. Digital gap analyses are applicable at field scale suggesting the possibility of transition from evaluating hybrids to designing genotype x management (GxM) technologies for target cropping systems in drought prone areas. Due to the biocomplexity of drought, research and development efforts should be sustained to advance knowledge and iteratively improve models. HighlightCrop improvement rate in maize increased after implementation of drought breeding efforts. Harnessing crop, quantitative genetics and gap models will enable the transition from genetic evaluation to crop design.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enviromic assembly increases accuracy and reduces costs of the genomic prediction for yield plasticity 97%
- Crop modeling suggests limited transpiration would increase yield of sorghum across drought-prone regions of the United States 96%
- Incorporating gene expression and environment improves genomic prediction of wheat traits 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic prediction of stalk lodging resistance and the associated intermediate phenotypes in maize using whole-genome resequence and multi-environmental data 97%
- Multi-trait multi-environment genomic prediction of preliminary yield trials in pulse crops 96%
- Genomic and Phenomic Prediction for Soybean Seed Yield, Protein, and Oil 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A new approach to crop model calibration: phenotyping plus post-processing. 97%
- Aerial High-Throughput Phenotyping Enabling Indirect Selection for Grain Yield at the Early-generation Seed-limited Stages in Breeding Programs 96%
- Reciprocal recurrent selection based on genetic complementation: An efficient way to build heterosis in diploids due to directional dominance 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-trait ensemble genomic prediction and simulations of recurrent selection highlight importance of complex trait genetic architecture in long-term genetic gains in wheat 96%
- Incorporating A Dynamic Gene-Based Process Module Into A Crop Simulation Model 96%
- Phenomics data processing: Extracting dose-response curve parameters from high-resolution temperature courses and repeated field-based wheat height measurements 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bigger is not always better: Optimizing leaf area index with narrow leaf shape in soybean 93%
- Variation in maize chlorophyll biosynthesis alters plant architecture 92%
- Large-scale field phenotyping using backpack LiDAR and GUI-based CropQuant-3D to measure structural responses to different nitrogen treatments in wheat 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.