How many and which species to plant? A multi-trait-based approach to select species to restore ecosystem services
Tsujii, P. K.; Coutinho, A. G.; Medina, A. M.; Kraft, N. J. B.; Gonzalez-Melo, A.; Higuchi, P.; Muller, S. C.; Niinemets, U.; Pillar, V. D.; Sosinski, E. E.; Carlucci, M. B.
Show abstract
It has been increasingly argued that ecological restoration should focus more on targeting ecosystem services than on species composition of reference ecosystems. In this sense, the role that species play on community assembly and functioning through their functional traits is very relevant, because effect traits mediate ecosystem processes, ultimately resulting in provision of ecosystem services. One major challenge in ecological restoration is to know which species to use that will deliver the target ecosystem services. We developed an algorithm to select the minimum set of species that maximize the functional richness (FRic) and the functional redundancy (FR) of the restored community, a proxy for the provision of multiple ecosystem services and the resilience of the system to environmental changes, respectively. For this, we simulated the restoration of 24 riparian woody communities of the Brazilian Cerrado. Using the species pool of each original local community, we ran restoration simulations for gradually increasing species richness until reaching the total species richness of the original local community. We computed FRic and FR for each simulated restoration community using the traits specific leaf area, maximum plant height and seed mass. Our simulation results indicate that multiple ecosystem services could be restored with an average of 66% of the species of the original community. Moreover, an average of 59% of the species would be needed to restore communities resilient to environmental changes. Our approach contributes to solving one of the major challenges of ecological restoration, which is defining how many and which species should be used to achieve functional targets. We believe this approach can help in projects of restoration by enabling restoration practitioners to select minimum alternative sets of species that optimize the provision of multiple ecosystem services in a resilient restored ecosystem.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Expert-led priorities for a response diversity research agenda in ecology 94%
- The Madingley General Ecosystem Model predicts bushmeat yields, species extinction rates and ecosystem-level impacts of bushmeat harvesting 94%
- Simple attributes predict the importance of plants as hosts to the richness of fungi and arthropods 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Higher-order dissimilarity in biodiversity: Identifying dissimilarities of spatial or temporal dissimilarity structures 94%
- Forest and Biodiversity 2: a tree diversity experiment to understand the consequences of multiple dimensions of diversity and composition for long-term ecosystem function and resilience 94%
- Including intraspecific trait variability to avoid distortion of functional diversity and ecological inference: lessons from natural assemblages 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vegetation structural complexity uniquely captures competition between vascular plants and bryophytes over succession 95%
- Long-term cross-scale comparison of grazing and mowing on plant diversity and community composition in a salt-marsh system 93%
- Forest structure and degradation drive canopy gap sizes across the Brazilian Amazon 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling the long-term dynamics of tropical forests: from leaf traits to whole-tree growth patterns 92%
- Spatially Explicit Modeling of Community Occupancy using Markov Random Field Models with Imperfect Observation: Mesocarnivores in Apostle Islands National Lakeshore 91%
- Animal-vectored nutrient flows across resource gradients influence the nature of local and meta-ecosystem functioning 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.