deMeta: Removing sub-studies from meta-analysis of genome wide association studies (GWAS)
Sun, J.; Wang, Y.
Show abstract
SummaryPost-GWAS studies using the results from large consortium meta-analysis often need to correctly take care of the overlapping sample issue. The gold standard approach for resolving this issue is to reperform the GWAS or meta-analysis excluding the overlapped participants. However, such approach is time-consuming and, sometimes, restricted by the available data. deMeta provides a user friendly and computationally efficient command-line implementation for removing the effect of a contributing sub-study to a consortium from the meta-analysis results. Only the summary statistics of the meta-analysis the sub-study to be removed are required. In addition, deMeta can generate contrasting Manhattan and quantile-quantile plots for users to visualize the impact of the sub-study on the meta-analysis results. Availability and ImplementationThe python source code, examples and documentations of deMeta are publicly available at https://github.com/Computational-NeuroGenetics/deMeta-beta. Contactjiangming.sun@med.lu.se (J. Sun); yunpeng.wang@psykologi.uio.no (Y. Wang) Supplementary informationNone.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MetaPhat: Detecting and decomposing multivariate associations from univariate genome-wide association statistics 94%
- SECNVs: A Simulator of Copy Number Variants and Whole-Exome Sequences from Reference Genomes 93%
- Impute.me: an open source, non-profit tool for using data from DTC genetic testing to calculate and interpret polygenic risk scores. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.