The COVID-19 Suffolk Events Toolkit (C-SET): A structured approach to conducting COVID-secure events
Chowdhury, A.; Zermanos, T.; Yu, X.; Badrinath, P.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo develop a toolkit to provide a structured framework for assessing whether large events are COVID-secure. Study designCross-sectional reporting on the development of the COVID-19 Suffolk Events Toolkit (C-SET). MethodsThe toolkit was developed through an iterative process of writing, discussion, and modification, drawing upon national UK guidance. Pilot cases and a contemporaneous consultation with experts were also undertaken, and C-SET was revised in line with the findings. ResultsC-SET offers a robust, structured approach to identifying areas of concern and potential mitigations, and collates and synthesises current national UK guidance. A flexible, modular design allows it to provide high-level input across all types of event, and allow modification to suit the needs of individual organisations. It is applicable to a variety of users, including event organisers in need of a structure, or bodies whose role is to appraise such events. It provides a semi-quantitative summary output, and in conjunction with the detailed links to guidance in the framework, allows development of clear, actionable recommendations to tangibly improve the quality of events. ConclusionsA necessary trade-off exists between COVID-related health risks and wider risks due to economic downturn, and facilitating large events in a way that minimises COVID transmission risk may offer a way to balance these competing priorities. C-SET was developed to provide a structured approach to identifying areas of improvement across key risk domains, and suggests potential mitigations that are underpinned by national UK guidance. Use of this toolkit may aid event organisers in developing COVID-secure events, and aid regulatory bodies in suggesting actionable recommendations through generation of a summary report of areas of concern.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 outbreak rates and infection attack rates associated with the workplace: a descriptive epidemiological study 94%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 94%
- Co-design and evaluation of a youth-informed organisational tool to enhance trauma-informed practices in the UK public sector: a study protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 92%
- The impact of COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions on the lived experiences of people living in Thailand, Malaysia, Italy and the United Kingdom: a cross-country qualitative study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How best do we engage the general population in testing for COVID-19? 93%
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 93%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning about COVID-19 across borders: Public health information and adherence among international travellers to the UK 94%
- Validation of a Difference-in-Differences Investigation Tool (DiD IT) for quantifying local outbreaks 93%
- Public health information on COVID-19 for international travellers: Lessons learned from a rapid mixed-method evaluation in the UK containment phase 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative analysis of variation in the quality and completeness of local outbreak control plans for SARS-CoV-2 in English local authorities 93%
- Social relationships and activities following elimination of SARS-CoV-2: a qualitative cross-sectional study 91%
- Introduction to and spread of COVID-19 in care homes in Norfolk, UK 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.