Back

Analytical and clinical evaluation of four anti-SARS-CoV-2 serologic (IgM, IgG, and total) immunoassays

Higgins, V.; Fabros, A.; Wang, X. Y.; Bhandari, M.; Daghfal, D. J.; Kulasingam, V.

2020-10-27 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.10.23.20217810 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is diagnosed by molecular-based detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Serologic testing detects antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2 and IgM specifically may serve as an adjunct test to PCR early in disease. We evaluated the Abbott anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG assays along with DiaSorin anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Roche anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total. MethodsSpecimens from 175 PCR-positive patients and 107 control specimens were analyzed using Abbott IgM and IgG, DiaSorin IgG, and Roche Total (IgA, IgG, IgM) assays. Sensitivity, specificity, cross-reactivity, concordance between assays, trends over time, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined. ResultsAbbott IgM sensitivity was 63.6% at 0 days post-PCR positivity, 76.5% at 1-5d, 76.3% at 6-14d, 85.2% at 15-30d, and 63.6% at >30d. All assays exhibited highest sensitivity 15-30d post-PCR positivity (83.3-85.2%). Combining Abbott IgM and IgG improved sensitivity by 22.7% compared to IgG alone when tested 0d post-PCR positivity. All assays had a specificity of 100% and only Abbott IgG exhibited cross-reactivity (anti-dsDNA). Cohens kappa varied between 0.86-0.93. Time to seroconversion from PCR positivity was lowest for Abbott IgM and highest for Abbott IgG. NPV was highest for Abbott IgM <14 days post-PCR positivity and Abbott IgG [&ge;]14 days. ConclusionThe Abbott IgM assay exhibited the earliest response and greatest signal in most patients evaluated for serial sampling and had the highest NPV <14 days post-PCR positivity, suggesting its potential utility as an adjunct test to PCR early in disease course.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.4%
2
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
18
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
24
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%