Back

Object-Attribute Biclustering for Elimination of Missing Genotypes in Ischemic Stroke Genome-Wide Data

Ignatov, D. I.; Khvorykh, G. V.; Khrunin, A. V.; Nikolic, S.; Shaban, M.; Petrova, E. A.; Koltsova, E. A.; Takelait, F.; Egurnov, D.

2020-10-23 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.10.22.349910 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Missing genotypes can affect the efficacy of machine learning approaches to identify the risk genetic variants of common diseases and traits. The problem occurs when genotypic data are collected from different experiments with different DNA microarrays, each being characterised by its pattern of uncalled (missing) genotypes. This can prevent the machine learning classifier from assigning the classes correctly. To tackle this issue, we used well-developed notions of object-attribute biclusters and formal concepts that correspond to dense subrelations in the binary relation patients x SNPs. The paper contains experimental results on applying a biclustering algorithm to a large real-world dataset collected for studying the genetic bases of ischemic stroke. The algorithm could identify large dense biclusters in the genotypic matrix for further processing, which in return significantly improved the quality of machine learning classifiers. The proposed algorithm was also able to generate biclusters for the whole dataset without size constraints in comparison to the In-Close4 algorithm for generation of formal concepts.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
31.6%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
Biosystems
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
5
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
● 38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Journal of Computational Biology
○ 48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
8
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
9
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
10
Briefings in Bioinformatics
◐ 354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
○ 230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
12
IEEE Access
● 35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
13
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
14
Expert Systems with Applications
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
16
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Life
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
BioData Mining
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
● 242 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%
22
Algorithms for Molecular Biology
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
23
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
○ 15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.