Back

Assessment of Heterogeneity of Cytochrome P450 Activity in Cancer-Cell Population by Cytometry of Reaction Rate Constant is Robust to Variation in Substrate Concentration

Bleker de Oliveira, M.; Koshkin, V.; Perry, C. G. R.; Krylov, S. N.

2020-10-15 cancer biology
10.1101/2020.10.15.341289 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Enzymes of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) family catalyze the metabolism of chemotherapeutic agents and are among the key players in primary and acquired chemoresistance of cancer. The activity of CYP is heterogeneous in tumor tissues, and the quantitative characteristics of this heterogeneity can be used to predict chemoresistance. Cytometry of reaction rate constant (CRRC) is a kinetic approach to assess cell population heterogeneity by measuring rates of processes at the single-cell level via time-lapse imaging. CRRC was shown to be an accurate and robust method for assessing the heterogeneity of drug-extrusion activity catalyzed by ABC transporters, which are also key players in cancer chemoresistance. We hypothesized that CRRC is also a reliable method for assessing the heterogeneity of CYP activity. Here, we evaluated the robustness of assessing the heterogeneity of CYP activity by CRRC with respect to controlled variation in the concentration of a CYP substrate by comparing CRRC with non-kinetic approaches. We found that changing the substrate concentration by 20% resulted only in minimal changes in the position, width, and asymmetry of the peak in the CRRC histogram, while these parameters varied greatly in the non-kinetic histograms. Moreover, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test showed that the distribution of the cell population in CRRC histograms was not significantly different; the result was opposite for non-kinetic histograms. In conclusion, we were able to demonstrate the robustness of CRRC with respect to changes in substrate concentration when evaluating CYP activity at the single-cell level.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.