Back

Intravenous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Extracorporeal Oxygenation Patients with Severe COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Kaushal, S.; Khan, A.; Deatrick, K.; Ng, D. K.; Snyder, A.; Shah, A.; Caceres, L. V.; Bacallao, K.; Bembea, M.; Everett, A.; Zhu, J.; Kaczorowski, D.; Madathil, R.; Tabatabai, A.; Rosenthal, G.; Brooks, A.; Longsomboon, B.; Mishra, R.; Saha, P.; Desire, Y.; Saltzman, R.; Hankey, K. G.; Arias, S. A.; Ayoade, F.; Tovar, J. A.; Lamazares, R.; Gershengorn, H. B.; Magali, F. J.; Loebe, M.; Mullins, K.; Gunasekaran, M.; Karakeshishyan, V.; Jayaweera, D. T.; Atala, A.; Ghodsizad, A.; Hare, J. M.

2020-10-20 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2020.10.15.20122523
Show abstract

BackgroundThere is an ongoing critical need to improve therapeutic strategies for COVID-19 pneumonia, particularly in the most severely affected patients. Adult mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) infusions have the potential to benefit critically ill patients with acute respiratory syndrome SARS-COV-2 infection, but clinical data supporting efficacy are lacking. MethodsWe conducted a case-control study of critically ill patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). To evaluate clinical responsiveness in the most critically ill patient we examined outcomes in a sub-group of those requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Patients (n=9) were administered with up to 3 infusions of intravenous (IV) MSCs and compared to a local ECMO control group (n=31). The primary outcome was safety, and the secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality (or rate of hospital discharge), cytokine levels, and viral clearance. FindingsMSC infusions (12 patients) were well tolerated and no side effects occurred. Of ECMO patients receiving MSC infusions, 2 out of 9 died (22.2%; 95%CI: 2.8%, 60.0%) compared with a mortality of 15 of 31 (48.4%; 95%CI: 30.2%, 66.9%; p = 0.25) in the ECMO control group. Isolated plasma exosomes containing the SARS-COV-2 Spike protein decreased after MSC infusions between day 14 or 21 after administration (p=0.003 and p=0.005, respectively) and was associated with a decrease in COVID-19 IgG Spike protein titer at same time points (p = 0.006 and p=0.007, respectively). Control ECMO patients receiving convalescent plasma did not clear COVID-19 IgG over the same time frame. InterpretationTogether these findings suggest that MSC IV infusion is well tolerated in patients with a broad range of severity including the most severe COVID-19 ARDS requiring ECMO. These data also raise the possibility that MSCs, in addition to exerting an immunomodulatory effect, contribute to viral clearance and strongly support the conduct of randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
13.2%
2
Critical Care Explorations
based on 15 papers
Top 0.3%
8.0%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 1%
4.9%
4
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 1%
4.7%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 70%
4.7%
6
New England Journal of Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 1.0%
3.0%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
based on 140 papers
Top 2%
3.0%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 5%
3.0%
9
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
based on 16 papers
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
based on 23 papers
Top 0.6%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Internal Medicine
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
13
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 8%
2.4%
14
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 9%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 71%
1.7%
17
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Trials
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
19
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
20
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 43%
1.4%
21
Clinical & Translational Immunology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
1.4%
22
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Clinical Immunology
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 14%
0.8%
25
The Lancet
based on 16 papers
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
28
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
29
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
30
The American Journal of Pathology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
0.8%