Age-differences in information flow in executive and sensorimotor brain networks during childhood and adolescence
Lund, M. J.; Alnaes, D.; Rokicki, J.; Schwab, S.; Andreassen, O.; Westlye, L. T.; Kaufmann, T.
Show abstract
Mental disorders often emerge during adolescence and have been associated with age-related differences in connection strengths of brain networks (static functional connectivity), manifesting in non-typical trajectories of brain development. However, little is known about the direction of information flow (directed functional connectivity) in this period of functional brain progression. We employed dynamic graphical models (DGM) to estimate directed functional connectivity from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging data on 1143 participants, aged 6 to 17 years from the healthy brain network (HBN) sample. We tested for effects of age, sex, cognitive abilities and psychopathology on estimates of direction flow. Across participants, we show a pattern of reciprocal information flow between visual-medial and visual-lateral connections, in line with findings in adults. Investigating directed connectivity patterns between networks, we observed a positive association for age and direction flow from the cerebellar to the auditory network, and for the auditory to the sensorimotor network. Further, higher cognitive abilities were linked to lower information flow from the visual occipital to the default mode network. Additionally, examining the degree networks overall send and receive information to each other, we identified age-related effects implicating the right frontoparietal and sensorimotor network. However, we did not find any associations with psychopathology. Our results revealed that the directed functional connectivity of large-scale brain networks is sensitive to age and cognition during adolescence, warranting further studies that may explore trajectories of development in more fine-grained network parcellations and in different populations.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in directed functional brain connectivity related to age, sex and mental health 98%
- Tensorial Independent Component Analysis Reveals Social and Reward Networks Associated with Major Depressive Disorder 98%
- Robust hierarchically organized whole-brain patterns of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia spectrum disorders observed after Personalized Intrinsic Network Topography 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain age prediction using fMRI network coupling in youths and associations with psychiatric symptoms 98%
- Exploring the longitudinal associations of functional network connectivity and psychiatric symptom changes in youth 97%
- Predicting depression risk in early adolescence via multimodal brain imaging 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conscientiousness associated with efficiency of the salience/ventral attention network: Replication in three samples using individualized parcellation 97%
- Neurodevelopmental Subtypes of Functional Brain Organization in the ABCD Study Using a Rigorous Analytic Framework 97%
- Reward Enhances Connectivity between the Ventral Striatum and the Default Mode Network 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficiency of heterogenous functional connectomes explains variance in callous-unemotional traits after computational lesioning of cortical midline and salience regions 97%
- Employing connectome-based models to predict working memory in multiple sclerosis 94%
- Dementia risk factors modify hubs but leave other connectivity measures unchanged in asymptomatic individuals: a graph theoretical analysis. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for a Compensatory Relationship between Left- and Right-Lateralized Brain Networks 96%
- Intrinsic functional connectivity among memory networks does not predict individual differences in narrative recall 96%
- High performers demonstrate greater neural synchrony than low performers across behavioral domains 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.