Back

Mapping QTL for spike fertility related traits in two double haploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) populations

Pretini, N.; Vanzetti, L. S.; Terrile, I. I.; Donaire, G.; Gonzalez, F. G.

2020-10-09 plant biology
10.1101/2020.10.08.331264 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In breeding programs, the selection of cultivars with the highest yield potential consisted in the selection of the yield per se, which resulted in cultivars with a higher grain number per spike (GN) and occasionally higher grain weight (GW) (main numerical components of the yield). This task could be facilitated with the use of molecular markers such us single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). In this study, quantitative trait loci (QTL) for GW, GN and spike fertility traits related to GN determination were mapped using two double haploid (DH) populations (Baguette Premium 11 x BioINTA 2002 and Baguette 19 x BioINTA 2002, BP11xB2002 and B19xB2002). Both populations were genotyped with the iSelect 90K SNP array and evaluated in four (BP11xB19) or five (B19xB2002) environments. We identify a total of 305 QTL for 14 traits, however 28 QTL for 12 traits were considered significant with an R2 > 10% and stable for being present at least in three environments. There were detected eight hotspot regions on chromosomes 1A, 2B, 3A, 5A, 5B, 7A and 7B were at least two major QTL sheared confident intervals. QTL on two of these regions have previously been described, but the other six regions were never observed, suggesting that these regions would be novel. The R5A1 (QSL.perg-5A, QCN.perg-5A,QGN.perg-5A) and R5A.2 (QFFTS.perg-5A, QGW.perg-5A) regions together with the QGW.perg-6B resulted in a final higher yield suggesting them to have high relevance as candidates to be used in MAS to improve yield. Author contribution statement Key message28 stable and major QTL for 12 traits associated to spike fertility, GN and GW were detected. Two regions on 5A Ch., and QGW.perg-6B showed direct pleiotropic effects on yield.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.4%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
5
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
7
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Molecular Biology Reports
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
24
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
26
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%