Back

Criteria for effective fallow field eco schemes for farmland birds during non-breeding

Rieger, M. R.; Mailaender, S. E.; Stier, L.; Staggenborg, J.; Anthes, N.

2020-10-09 ecology
10.1101/2020.10.07.329847 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIFarmland eco schemes implemented under the current Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union are often considered ineffective in halting farmland bird declines. Fallow fields, often seeded with dedicated seed mixtures, rate among the more beneficial eco scheme types. Yet, the CAP currently defines no minimum criteria for fallow fields to qualify as eco scheme, likely jeopardizing their potential biodiversity benefits. C_LIO_LIWe investigated the attractiveness of four fallow field types established under CAP eco schemes and dedicated bird conservation programs in Southern Germany. Our 2-year surveys on > 100 fields focused on the non-breeding season, where food limitation can become particularly problematic. We modelled bird incidences also in response to vegetation structure and adjacent landscape features to derive minimum criteria for effective fallow field eco schemes. C_LIO_LIFallow field types varied only mildly in overall species richness but showed striking differences in the attracted species. Finches in particular tended to preferentially visit 1-year fallow fields, while buntings tended towards 2-year and older field types. 1-year CAP fallows, however, are typically removed before mid-winter, and thus potentially act as a trap to farmland birds and other wildlife. C_LIO_LIThe investigated species consistently preferred larger fallow fields with a more differentiated vegetation structure. Placement close to woods and hedgerows positively affected birds inhabiting woodland ecotones, while classic farmland species showed higher incidences on fallow fields embedded in open landscapes. C_LIO_LI Policy implications Our findings call for the ongoing CAP revisions to specify minimum requirements that qualify fallow fields as eco schemes. These should include an at least biennial cycle, a diversification of seed mixtures, standards for fallow field size, and criteria for their placement in the landscape matrix. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.5%
2
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.0%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.6%
6
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
8
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
9
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
11
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
12
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
13
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
19
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.6%