Economic precarity, social isolation, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic
Raifman, J.; Ettman, C.; Dean, L.; Barry, C.; Galea, S.
Show abstract
ImportanceThe US population faces stressors associated with suicide brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the relationship between stressors and suicidal ideation may inform policies and programs to prevent suicide. ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between stressors and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic. DesignWe compared suicidal ideation in 2017-2018 to suicidal ideation in 2020. We estimated the association between stressors and suicidal ideation in bivariable and multivariable Poisson regression models with robust variance. SettingUnited States ParticipantsParticipants were from two, nationally representative surveys of US adults: The 2017-2017 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the 2020 COVID-19 and Life Stressors Impact on Mental Health and Well-being study (conducted March 31 to April 13), analyzed April 28 to September 30, 2020. ExposuresEconomic precarity as measured through job loss or difficulty paying rent and social isolation based on reporting "feeling alone." Main outcome measureSuicidal ideation based on reporting "Thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way" over the past two weeks. ResultsSuicidal ideation increased more than fourfold, from 3.4% in the 2017-2018 NHANES to 16.3% in the 2020 CLIMB survey, and from 5.8% to 26.4% among participants in low-income households. Suicidal ideation was more prevalent among people facing difficulty paying rent (31.5%), job loss (24.1%), and loneliness (25.1%), with each stressor associated with suicidal ideation in bivariable models. In the multivariable model, difficulty paying rent was associated with suicidal ideation (aPR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2 to 2.1), while losing a job was not (aPR: 0.9, 95% CI: 0.6 to 1.2). Feeling alone was associated with suicidal ideation (aPR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.5 to 2.4). Conclusions and relevanceSuicidal ideation increased more than fourfold during the COVID-19 pandemic. Difficulty paying rent and loneliness were most associated with suicidal ideation. Policies and programs to support people experiencing economic precarity and loneliness may contribute to suicide prevention.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Associated with Serious Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan 92%
- “When will this end? Will it end?” The impact of the March-June 2020 UK Covid-19 lockdown response on mental health: a longitudinal survey of mothers in the Born in Bradford study 92%
- The State of Ohio Adversity and Resilience (SOAR) Study Protocol: A Comprehensive, Multimodal, Family-based, Longitudinal Investigation of Risk and Resilience in Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- Excess death among Latino people in California during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Childhood intelligence and risk of depression in later-life: A longitudinal data-linkage study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncovering Survivorship Bias in Longitudinal Mental Health Surveys 96%
- Trends in suicide rates during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions in a major German city 91%
- Mental health problems in the general population during and after the first lockdown phase due to the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic: Rapid review of multi-wave studies 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conspiratorial thinking in a 50-state survey of American adults 95%
- Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation Among Unpaid Caregivers in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Relationships to Age, Race/Ethnicity, Employment, and Caregiver Intensity 94%
- General Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire as a marker of low socioeconomic status and inequity 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.