Back

Artificial intelligence-driven real-time 3D surface quantification of Barrett's oesophagus for risk stratification and therapeutic response monitoring

Ali, S.; Bailey, A.; East, J. E.; Leedham, S. J.; Haghighat, M.; Investigators, T.; Lu, X.; Rittscher, J.; Braden, B.

2020-10-06 gastroenterology
10.1101/2020.10.04.20206482 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMSBarretts epithelium measurement using widely accepted Prague C&M criteria is highly operator dependent. By reconstructing the surface of the Barretts area in 3D from endoscopy video, we propose a novel methodology for measuring the C&M score automatically. This 3D reconstruction provides an extended field of view and also allows to precisely quantify the Barretts area including islands. We aim to assess the accuracy of the extracted measurements from phantom and demonstrate their clinical usability. METHODSAdvanced deep learning techniques are utilised to design estimators for depth and camera pose required to map standard endoscopy video to a 3D surface model. By segmenting the Barretts area and locating the position of the gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) we measure C&M scores and the Barretts oesophagus areas (BOA). Experiments using a purpose-built 3D printed oesophagus phantom and high-definition video from 98 patients scored by an expert endoscopist are used for validation. RESULTSEndoscopic phantom video data demonstrated a 95 % accuracy with a marginal {+/-} 1.8 mm average deviation for C&M and island measurements, while for BOA we achieved nearly 93 % accuracy with only {+/-} 1.1 cm2 average deviation compared to the ground-truth measurements. On patient data, the C&M measurements provided by our system concord with the reference provided by expert upper GI endoscopists. CONCLUSIONSThe proposed methodology is suitable for extracting Prague C&M scores automatically with a high degree of accuracy. Providing an accurate measurement of the entire Barretts area provides new opportunities for risk stratification and the assessment of therapy response.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.5%
4
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
7
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
8
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
10
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
17
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
22
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
28
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%