Back

High Definition transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) for chronic tinnitus: outcomes from a prospective longitudinal large cohort study

Jacquemin, L.; Mertens, G.; Shekhawat, G. S.; Van de Heyning, P.; Vanderveken, O. M.; Topsakal, V.; De Hertogh, W.; Michiels, S.; Beyers, J.; Moyaert, J.; Van Rompaey, V.; Gilles, A.

2020-10-02 otolaryngology
10.1101/2020.10.02.20173237 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) aims to induce cortical plasticity by modulating the activity of brain structures. The broad stimulation pattern, which is one of the main limitations of tDCS, can be overcome with the recently developed technique called High-Definition tDCS (HD-TDCS). ObjectiveInvestigation of the effect of HD-tDCS on tinnitus in a large patient cohort. MethodsThis prospective study included 117 patients with chronic, subjective, non-pulsatile tinnitus who received six sessions of anodal HD-tDCS of the right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC). Therapy effects were assessed by use of a set of standardized tinnitus questionnaires filled out at the pre-therapy (Tpre), post-therapy (T3w) and follow-up visit (T10w). Besides collecting the questionnaire data, the perceived effect (i.e. self-report) was also documented at T10w. ResultsThe Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) and Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) total scores improved significantly over time (pTFI < .01; pTQ < .01), with the following significant post-hoc comparisons: Tpre vs. T10w (pTFI < .05; pTQ < .05) and T3w vs. T10w (pTFI < .01 ; pTQ < .01). The percentage of patients reporting an improvement of their tinnitus at T10w was 47%. Further analysis revealed a significant effect of gender with female patients showing a larger improvement on the TFI and TQ (pTFI < .01; pTQ < .05). ConclusionsThe current study reported the effects of HD-tDCS in a large tinnitus population. HD-tDCS of the right DLPFC resulted in a significant improvement of the tinnitus perception, with a larger improvement for the female tinnitus patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.5%
2
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.2%
3
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
4
Brain Research Bulletin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Ear & Hearing
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
7
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
10
Neuroscience Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
13
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Sleep Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
17
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%