Aetiological differences between novel subtypes of diabetes derived from genetic associations
Mansour Aly, D.; Prakash Dwivedi, O.; Prasad, R. B.; Karajamaki, A.; Hjort, R.; Akerlund, M.; Mahajan, A.; Udler, M. S.; Florez, J. C.; McCarthy, M. I.; Genetics Center, R.; Brosnan, J.; Melander, O.; Carlsson, S.; Hansson, O.; Tuomi, T.; Groop, L.; Ahlqvist, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundType 2 diabetes (T2D) is a multi-organ disease defined by hyperglycemia resulting from different disease mechanisms. Using clinical parameters measured at diagnosis (age, BMI, HbA1c, HOMA2-B, HOMA2-IR and GAD autoantibodies) adult patients with diabetes have been reproducibly clustered into five subtypes, that differed clinically with respect to disease progression and outcomes.1 In this study we use genetic information to investigate if these subtypes have distinct underlying genetic drivers. MethodsGenome-wide association (GWAS) and genetic risk score (GRS) analysis was performed in Swedish (N=12230) and Finnish (N=4631) cohorts. Family history was recorded by questionnaires. ResultsSevere insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD) and mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD) groups had the strongest family history of T2D. A GRS including known T2D loci was strongly associated with SIDD (OR per 1 SD increment [95% CI]=1.959 [1.814-2.118]), MOD (OR 1.726 [1.607-1.855]) and mild age-related diabetes (MARD) (OR 1.771 [1.671-1.879]), whereas it was less strongly associated with severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD, OR 1.244 [1.157-1.337]), which was similar to severe autoimmune diabetes (SAID, OR 1.282 [1.160-1.418]). SAID showed strong association with the GRS for T1D, whereas the non-autoimmune subtype SIDD was most strongly associated with the GRS for insulin secretion rate (P<7.43x10-9). SIRD showed no association with variants in TCF7L2 or any GRS reflecting insulin secretion. Instead, only SIRD was associated with GRS for fasting insulin (P=3.10x10-8). Finally, a T2D locus, rs10824307 near the ZNF503 gene was uniquely associated with MOD (ORmeta=1.266 (1.170-1.369), P=4.3x10-9). ConclusionsNew diabetes subtypes have partially different genetic backgrounds and subtype-specific risk loci can be identified. Especially the SIRD subtype stands out by having lower heritability and less involvement of beta-cell related pathways in its pathogenesis. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSIn March 2018 we suggested a novel subclassification of diabetes into five subtypes. This classification was based on clustering using clinical parameters commonly measured at diabetes diagnosis (age at diabetes onset, HbA1c, bodymass index, presence of GAD autoantibodies and HOMA2 indices for insulin resistance and secretion). These subtypes differed with respect to clinical characteristics, disease progression and risk of complications, but it remained unclear to what extent these subtypes have different underlying pathologies. In our original publication we analysed a small set of genetic risk variants for diabetes and found differential associations between subtypes, suggesting potential aetiological differences. Added value of this studyIn this study we have conducted a full genome analysis of the original ANDIS cohort, including genome-wide association studies and polygenic risk score analysis with replication in an independent cohort. We have also compared heritability and prevalence of having a family history of diabetes in the subtypes. Implications of all the available evidenceWe demonstrate that stratification into subtypes facilitates identification of genetic risk loci and that the aetiology of the subtypes is at least partially distinct. These results are especially important for the future study and treatment of individuals belonging to the severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD) subtype, whose pathogenesis appears to differ substantially from that of traditional T2D.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic Background Contributes to GCK-MODY Clinical Presentation and Glycaemic Variability 97%
- Development and validation of a Trans-Ancestry polygenic risk score for Type 1 Diabetes 95%
- Young onset diabetes in Asian Indians is associated with lower measured and genetically determined beta-cell function: an INSPIRED study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Specific type 1 diabetes risk genes underpin age-at-diagnosis and indicate joint defects in immunity, beta-cell fragility and responses to viral infections in early-onset disease. 96%
- Accounting for age-related increases in HbA1c more accurately quantifies risk of Type 1 Diabetes progression in islet autoantibody-positive adults 95%
- Poor in-utero growth, reduced beta cell secretion and high plasma glucose in childhood are harbingers of glucose intolerance in young Indians 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Treatment outcomes with oral anti-hyperglycaemic therapies in people with diabetes secondary to a pancreatic condition (type 3c diabetes): A population-based cohort study 94%
- Subgroups of adult-onset diabetes: a prospective follow-up study of progression of insulin resistance and deficiency and association with liver steatosis and fibrosis 94%
- Integrated miRNA_mRNA Analysis Reveals Dysregulated Regulatory Networks in Visceral Adipose Tissue Linked to Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- MODY is prevalent in later-onset diabetes, has potential for targeted therapy but is challenging to identify 94%
- Impacts of COVID-19 on glycemia and risk of diabetic ketoacidosis 93%
- Improved specificity of glutamate decarboxylase 65 autoantibody measurement using luciferase-based immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assays 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnic differences in the manifestation of early-onset type 2 diabetes 94%
- A plasma metabolite score of three eicosanoids predicts incident type 2 diabetes – a prospective study in three independent cohorts 92%
- Comprehensive validation of fasting- and oral glucose tolerance test-based indices of insulin secretion against gold-standard measures 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.