Back

Assessment of Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays, Jamaica

Butterfield, T. R.; Bruce-Mowatt, A.; Phillips, Y. Z. R.; Brown, N.; Francis, K.; Brown, J.; Taylor, D.; Bruce, C. A.; McGrowder, D.; Wharfe, G.; Sandiford, S. L.; Thompson, T. K.; Anzinger, J. J.

2020-09-29 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.09.27.20202655
Show abstract

The performance of the Roche Elecsys(R) Anti-SARS-CoV-2, Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgA, Euroimmun SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA, and Trillium IgG/IgM rapid assays was evaluated in Jamaica, the largest country of the English-speaking Caribbean. Diagnostic sensitivities of the assays were assessed by testing serum samples from SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed persons. Serum samples collected [≥]14 days after onset of symptoms, or [≥]14 days after an initial SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive test for asymptomatics, showed diagnostic sensitivities ranging from 67.9-75.0% when including all possible disease severities and increased to 90.0-95.0% when examining those with moderate to critical disease. Grouping moderate to critical disease showed a significant association with a SARS-CoV-2 antibody positive result for all assays. Diagnostic specificity, assessed by testing serum samples collected during 2018-2019 from healthy persons and from persons with antibodies to a wide range of viral infections, ranged from 96.7-100.0%. For all assays examined, SARS-CoV-2 real-time PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values of the initial nasopharyngeal swab sample testing positive were significantly different for samples testing antibody positive versus negative. These data from a predominantly African descent Caribbean population shows comparable diagnostic sensitivities and specificities for all testing platforms assessed and limited utility of these tests for persons with asymptomatic and mild infections.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 46%
11.1%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 0.7%
11.0%
3
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 0.6%
7.5%
4
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 0.4%
7.5%
5
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 2%
4.5%
6
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 0.7%
4.5%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 3%
2.9%
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 9%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Microbiology Spectrum
based on 86 papers
Top 0.6%
2.8%
10
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 56%
2.8%
12
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 4%
2.8%
13
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 4%
2.4%
14
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
15
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
1.6%
17
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
based on 15 papers
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 11%
1.6%
19
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
based on 14 papers
Top 0.5%
1.6%
20
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 13%
1.3%
21
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
22
EClinicalMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 53%
0.7%
24
Wellcome Open Research
based on 34 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
25
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 13%
0.7%
26
Journal of Medical Microbiology
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
27
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
28
Infectious Diseases
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
29
The Lancet Microbe
based on 33 papers
Top 5%
0.7%