A Brief Burnout Evaluation Scale (BBES) as a potential tool to prevent collapse of the health care task force during the COVID-19 pandemic
Bastos, T. M.; Monteiro, G. M. C.; Borges, R. B.; Moser, C. M.; Arenas, D. L.; Bassols, A. M.; Laskoski, P. B.; Hauck, S.
Show abstract
IntroductionIn the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where overloaded health systems seem inevitable, there is a need for reliable, conceptually adequate, and easily applied measurement tools to identify health professionals at risk. Objectiveto present the preliminary psychometric properties of a Brief Burnout Evaluation Scale (BBES) and its association with important outcomes, i.e., moderate to severe depression and suicidal ideation. MethodsThe BBES has 4 Likert-type items and was tested as part of a cross-sectional study that included 401 medical students. Reliability analysis and validity studies were performed. ResultsIn the parallel analysis, two factors were extracted, explaining 84.4% of the variance. The Cronbachs alpha was 0.78, showing high internal consistency. Considering a cut-off point of 12, the odds ratio for moderate to severe depression was 3.01 (CI 1.7-5.22; p<0.001) and for last month suicidal ideation 2.96 (CI 1.6-5.48). ConclusionThe results suggest good psychometric characteristics for the BBES, thus reinforcing its utility as an assessment tool for evaluating the well-being or distress of health professionals. It carries with it the potential to implement early interventions and to prevent the descent into burnout so common today in the health care task force during the pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High prevalence of burnout syndrome among medical and nonmedical residents during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Changes in hospital staff mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal results from the international COPE-CORONA study 96%
- Determinants Of Burnout And Other Aspects Of Psychological Well-Being In Healthcare Workers During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Virtual mindfulness interventions to promote well-being in young adults: A mixed-methods systematic review 94%
- Closed Doors: Predictors of Stress, Anxiety, Depression, and PTSD During the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil 94%
- Occupational stigma and post-traumatic stress disorder among healthcare workers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 94%
- Psychosocial impact of the Covid-19 pandemic: Identification of most vulnerable populations 94%
- Relationship Between Adverse Events Prevalence, Patient Safety Culture And Patient Safety Perception In A Single Sample Of Patients: A Cross-Sectional And Correlational Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health services use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study 92%
- Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 epidemic in China: a web-based cross-sectional survey 91%
- Global burden of mental health problems among children and adolescents during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic umbrella review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health of healthcare workers during early phase of COVID19: Variable performance on different factors of stress 95%
- A cross-sectional survey of material deprivation and suicide-related ideation among Vietnamese technical interns in Japan in 2021 93%
- Quality of life and depressive symptoms among Peruvian university students during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.