Back

Imbalanced expression for predicted high-impact, autosomal-dominant variants in a cohort of 3,818 healthy samples

de Klein, N.; van Dijk, F.; Deelen, P.; Urzua, C. G.; Claringbould, A.; Vosa, U.; Verlouw, J. A. M.; Monajemi, R.; 't Hoen, P. A. C.; Sinke, R. J.; BIOS Consortium, ; Swertz, M. A.; Franke, L.

2020-09-20 genomics
10.1101/2020.09.19.300095 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOne of the growing problems in genome diagnostics is the increasing number of variants that get identified through genetic testing but for which it is unknown what the significance for the disease is (Variants of Unknown Significance - VUS)1,2. When these variants are observed in patients, clinicians need to be able to determine their relevance for causing the patients disease. Here we investigated whether allele-specific expression (ASE) can be used to prioritize disease-relevant VUS and therefore assist diagnostics. In order to do so, we conducted ASE analysis in RNA-seq data from 3,818 blood samples (part of the the Dutch BIOS biobank consortium), to ascertain how VUS affect gene expression. We compared the effect of VUS variants to variants that are predicted to have a high impact, and variants that are predicted to be pathogenic but are either recessive or autosomal-dominant with low penetrance. ResultsFor immune and haematological disorders, we observed that 24.7% of known pathogenic variants from ClinVar show allelic imbalance in blood, as compared to 6.6% of known benign variants with matching allele frequencies. However, for other types of disorders, ASE information from blood did not distinguish (likely) pathogenic variants from benign variants. Unexpectedly, we identified 5 genes (ALOX5, COMT, PRPF8, PSTPIP1 and SH3BP2) in which seven population-based samples had a predicted high impact, autosomal-dominant variant. For these genes the imbalanced expression of the major allele compensates for the lower expression of the minor allele. ConclusionsOur analysis in a large population-based gene expression cohort reveals examples of high impact, autosomal-dominant variants that are compensated for by imbalanced expression. Additionally, we observed that ASE analyses in blood are informative for predicting pathogenic variants that are associated with immune and haematological conditions. We have made all our ASE results, including many ASE calls for rare variants (MAF < 1%), available at https://molgenis15.gcc.rug.nl/.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.3%
3
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
4
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
6
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
9
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
11
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
15
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
17
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
22
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
24
Genes & Immunity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%