Back

Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Karnataka State, South India: Transmission dynamics of symptomatic vs. asymptomatic infections

Kumar, N.; Hameed, S. K. S.; Babu, G. R.; Venkataswamy, M. M.; Dinesh, P.; Kumar, P. B. G.; John, D. A.; Desai, A.; Vasanthapuram, R.

2020-09-18 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.09.17.20196501
Show abstract

Background: In this report, we describe the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection, specifically examining how the symptomatic persons drove the transmission in the state of Karnataka, India, during the lockdown phase. Methods: The study included all the cases reported from March 8 to May 31, 2020 in the state. Any person with history of international or domestic travel from high burden states, those presenting with Influenza-like or Severe Acute Respiratory Illness and high-risk contacts of COVID19 cases, who were SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive were included. Detailed analysis based on contact tracing data available from line-list of the state surveillance unit was performed using cluster analysis software package. Findings: Amongst the 3404 COVID-19 positive cases, 3096 (91%) were asymptomatic while 308 (9%) were symptomatic. Majority of the asymptomatic cases were in the age range of 16-50 years while symptomatic cases were between 31-65 years. Most of those affected were males. Cluster analysis of 822 cases indicated that the secondary attack rate, size of the cluster (dispersion) and occurrence of overt clinical illness is significantly higher when the index case in a cluster was symptomatic compared to an asymptomatic. Interpretation: Our findings indicate that both asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases transmit the infection; however, the main driving force behind the spread of infection within the state was significantly higher from symptomatic cases. This has major implications for policies related to testing. Active search for symptomatic cases, subjecting them to testing and treatment should be prioritized for containing the spread of COVID-19.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 20%
18.5%
2
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 0.7%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 37%
4.9%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 8%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 8%
3.1%
7
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
based on 10 papers
Top 0.3%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 9%
2.7%
9
IJID Regions
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
2.7%
10
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 4%
2.5%
11
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 5%
1.9%
12
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 40%
1.7%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 8%
1.7%
14
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 7%
1.4%
16
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 11%
1.4%
17
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Journal of Travel Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 18%
0.9%
21
Public Health
based on 34 papers
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Journal of Public Health
based on 23 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 23%
0.7%
25
Wellcome Open Research
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
26
EClinicalMedicine
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.7%