Back

SARS-CoV-2 N-antigenemia: A new alternative to nucleic acid amplification techniques

Le Hingrat, Q.; Visseaux, B.; Laouenan, C.; Tubiana, S.; Bouadma, L.; Yazdanpanah, Y.; Duval, X.; Ichou, H.; Damond, F.; Bertine, M.; Benmalek, N.; French COVID cohort management committee, ; CoV-CONTACT study group, ; Choquet, C.; Timsit, J.-F.; Ghosn, J.; Charpentier, C.; Descamps, D.; Houhou-Fidouh, N.

2020-09-15 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.09.14.20191759
Show abstract

Background. Molecular assays on nasopharyngeal swabs remain the cornerstone of COVID-19 diagnostic. Despite massive worldwide efforts, the high technicalities of nasopharyngeal sampling and molecular assays, as well as scarce resources of reagents, limit our testing capabilities. Several strategies failed, to date, to fully alleviate this testing process (e.g. saliva sampling or antigen testing on nasopharyngeal samples). We assessed the performances of a new ELISA microplate assay quantifying SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen (N-antigen) in serum or plasma. Methods. The specificity of the assay, determined on 63 non-COVID patients, was 98.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.3 to 100). Performances were determined on 227 serum samples from 165 patients with RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection included in the French COVID and CoV-CONTACT cohorts. Findings. Sensitivity was 132/142, 93.0% (95% CI, 84.7 to 100), within the first two weeks after symptoms onset. A subset of 73 COVID-19 patients had a serum collected within 24 hours following or preceding a positive nasopharyngeal swab. Among patients with high nasopharyngeal viral loads, Ct value below 30 and 33, only 1/50 and 4/67 tested negative for N-antigenemia, respectively. Among patients with a negative nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, 8/12 presented positive N-antigenemia. The lower respiratory tract was explored for 6/8 patients, showing positive PCR in 5 cases. Interpretation. This is the first demonstration of the N-antigen antigenemia during COVID-19. Its detection presented a robust sensitivity, especially within the first 14 days after symptoms onset and high nasopharyngeal viral loads. These findings have to be confirmed with higher representation of outpatients. This approach could provide a valuable new option for COVID-19 diagnosis, only requiring a blood draw and easily scalable in all clinical laboratories.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 0.4%
10.8%
2
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 0.2%
8.0%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 60%
7.3%
4
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
based on 54 papers
Top 0.2%
7.3%
5
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 0.4%
5.6%
6
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
5.6%
7
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 1%
5.2%
8
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 0.7%
2.7%
10
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 57%
2.7%
11
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 12%
2.4%
13
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
2.2%
14
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 2%
2.2%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 6%
2.2%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 9%
2.2%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
based on 86 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 32%
1.5%
20
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.7%
1.5%
21
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 8%
1.3%
22
The Lancet Microbe
based on 33 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
23
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 10%
0.8%
24
Microorganisms
based on 21 papers
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
based on 15 papers
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Microbiology
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
0.8%