Back

Visualizing the cytosolic delivery of bioconjugated QDs into T cell lymphocytes

Jing, H.; Pálmai, M.; Saed, B.; George, A.; Snee, P. T.; Hu, Y. S.

2020-09-13 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.09.12.294991 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The aggregation state and endosomal trapping of engineered nanocarriers once internalized into cells remain poorly characterized. Here, we visualized the membrane penetrating dynamics of semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) into the cytosol of T cells on a single-cell and single-nanoparticle basis. We water solubilized CdSe/CdZnS QDs with polymer encapsulants functionalized with a cell-penetrating peptide composed of an Asp-Ser-Ser (DSS) repeat sequence. T cells tolerated the 24-h incubation with QDs at concentrations of 5 nM or lower. Single-particle imaging demonstrated that the number of internalized nanoparticles was dependent upon the concentration of the probes for both control (peptide-free) and DSS-QDs. DSS-QDs were mostly distributed as monomers, whereas the control QDs were aggregated into clusters. Single-particle tracking using total internal reflection and highly inclined illumination showed that DSS-QDs were stationary near the activating surface and mobile within the cytosol of the T cell. A correlation exhibited between the mobility and aggregation state of individual QD clusters, with monomeric DSS-QDs showing the highest mobility. In addition, monomeric DSS-QDs displayed much faster diffusion than the endosomes. A small-molecule endosome marker confirmed the absence of colocalization between endosomes and DSS-QDs, indicating their endosomal escape. The ability to deliver and track individual QDs in the cytosol of live T cells creates inroads for the optimization of drug delivery and gene therapy through the use of nanoparticles.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.6%
2
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
5
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
7
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
8
Bioconjugate Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
9
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
10
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
11
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
12
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
14
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
17
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
19
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%