Back

Single-Cell Transcriptomic Attributes and Unbiased Computational Modeling for the Prediction of Immunomodulatory Potency of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Pradhan, P.; Chatterjee, P.; Stevens, H. Y.; Glen, C.; Medrano-Trochez, C.; Jimenez, A.; Kippner, L.; Seeto, W. J.; Li, Y.; Gibson, G.; Kurtzberg, J.; Kontanchek, T.; Yeago, C.; Roy, K.

2020-09-12 immunology
10.1101/2020.09.12.294850 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are currently being tested in numerous clinical trials as potential cell therapies for the treatment of various diseases and due to their potential immunomodulatory, pro-angiogenic, and regenerative properties. However, variabilities in tissue sources, donors, and manufacturing processes and the lack of defined critical quality attributes (CQAs) and clinically relevant mechanism of action (MoA) pose significant challenges to identify MSC cell therapy products with a predictable therapeutic outcome. This also hinders regulatory considerations and broad clinical translation of MSCs. MSC products are often administered to the patient immediately after thawing from cryopreserved vials (out-of-thaw). However, the qualifying quality-control assays are either performed before cryopreservation, or after culturing the post-thaw cells for 24-48 hours (culture-rescued), none of which represent the out-of-thaw product administered to patients. In this study, we performed a broad functional characterization of out-of-thaw and culture-rescue MSCs from bone marrow (BM-MSCs) and cord tissue (CT-MSCs) using macrophage activation and T cell proliferation-based in vitro potency assays and deep phenotypic characterization using single-cell RNA-sequencing. Using this data, we developed unbiased computational models, specifically symbolic regression (SR) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) models to predict the immunomodulatory potency of MSCs. Overall, our results suggest that manufacturing conditions (OOT vs. CR) have a strong effect on MSC-function on MSC interactions with macrophages and T cells. Furthermore, single-cell RNA-seq analyses of out-of-thaw BM and CT-MSCs indicate a tissue of origin-dependent variability and heterogeneity in the transcriptome profile. Using symbolic regression modeling we identified specific single-cell transcriptomic attributes of MSCs that predict their immunomodulatory potency. In addition, CCA modeling predicted MSC donors with high or low immunomodulatory potency from their transcriptome profiles. Taken together, our results provide a broad framework for identifying predictive CQAs of MSCs that could ultimately help in better understanding of their MOAs and improved reproducibility and manufacturing control of MSCs.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
16
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
25
Immunology & Cell Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%