Evolution of research in biomedical sciences - a network-based characterization based on PubMed
Friedrichs, K.; Spranger, M.; Palaniappan, S.
Show abstract
The rapid growth of scientific publications every year makes it infeasible to keep pace with and survey manually, even for a specific field. Keeping up with literature and gaining a birds-eye view in a timely manner is crucial to the pursuit of scientific discovery and innovation. To help gain a clearer understanding of the state and progress of science and the nature of discovery, one can encode key information from these publications and represent them as a network. Observations on the structural evolution of these graphs can offer valuable insights on the dynamics at play. This work describes the construction and analyses the temporal evolution of a knowledge network of keywords (specifically focusing on genes/proteins, diseases and chemicals) from publications in the biomedical sciences domain. We compare and contrast the representations and evolution of these keyword networks types and find significant differences in the network growth, largely corresponding to our intuition. Furthermore, we focus on the formation and evolution of new links, which we argue corresponds to new scientific discoveries. Our findings suggest that these links are progressively formed in short network distance, leading to clusters of extensively studied keywords. This strategy, however, seems to impede ground-breaking innovation, which could be beneficial for research progress.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated recognition of functional compound-protein relationships in literature 95%
- Alignment of virus-host protein-protein interaction networks by integer linear programming: SARS-CoV-2 94%
- Predicting Adverse Drug Effects: A Heterogeneous Graph Convolution Network with a Multi-layer Perceptron Approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method 95%
- Comparing protein-protein interaction networks of SARS-CoV-2 and (H1N1) influenza using topological features 93%
- Tensor decomposition- and principal component analysis-based unsupervised feature extraction to select more reasonable differentially expressed genes: Optimization of standard deviation versus state-of-art methods 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- iMDA-BN: Identification of miRNA-Disease Associations based on the Biological Network and Graph Embedding Algorithm 93%
- SpatialPPI: three-dimensional space protein-protein interaction prediction with AlphaFold Multimer 92%
- TCMM: A Unified Database for Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Therapeutic Innovations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enrichment analysis on regulatory subspaces: a novel direction for the superior description of cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 94%
- VICTOR: A visual analytics web application for comparing cluster sets 93%
- AE-LGBM: Sequence-Based Novel Approach To Detect Interacting Protein Pairs via Ensemble of Autoencoder and LightGBM. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- De novo identification of maximally deregulated subnetworks based on multi-omics data with DeRegNet 93%
- StrongestPath: a Cytoscape application for protein-protein interaction analysis 93%
- A Dual Controllability Analysis of Influenza Virus-Host Protein-Protein Interaction Networks for Antiviral Drug Target Discovery 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.