Oxygen Saturation or breathlessness? How best to predict pneumonia in patients presenting with a cough to primary care
Chambers, E.; Stuart, B.; Moore, M.; Lown, M.
Show abstract
SYNOPSISO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSDistinguishing pneumonia from acute bronchitis has an important bearing on treatment decisions. The best validated diagnostic decision rule was derived from the GRACE-09 study. The 3Cs study provides oxygen saturations in addition to clinical signs and symptoms. Oxygen saturation is a predictor in hospital settings and may be beneficial in primary care. ObjectivesThis project evaluates whether the data from GRACE-09 and 3Cs studies can be mapped onto each other and be combined dataset to refine the diagnostic accuracy of the GRACE-09 clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of pneumonia. Patients and MethodsGRACE-09 included 3106 patients with acute cough in a multicentre European study. 3Cs is a UK based study of 28883 patients with acute cough. Binary logistic regression was used in the 3Cs dataset to determine which variables significantly predicted low oxygen saturation (<95%). Statistically significant predictors were determined using area under curve (AUC). This equation was used to model the probability of low oxygen saturation in the GRACE-09 dataset and subsequently included in the GRACE-09 model to determine whether low oxygen saturation is a comparable predictor to breathlessness in predicting pneumonia. ResultsFor 3Cs, using all seven variables achieved an AUC for low oxygen saturation of 0.73 (95% CI 0.72-0.74). Substituting low oxygen saturation into GRACE-09 model gives AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.69-0.82) compared to original GRACE-09 using breathlessness and gives AUC 0.77 (95% CI 0.73-0.82). ConclusionsLow oxygen saturation and breathlessness are similarly predictive and could be used interchangeably in a modified GRACE-09 prediction model. KEY MESSAGESCan pulse oximetry replace subjective breathlessness assessment in the GRACE-09 prediction rule? Pulse oximetry gives an objective measurement that can be used to assist the diagnosis of pneumonia in primary care.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-way remote monitoring allows effective and realistic provision of home-NIV to COPD patients with persistent hypercapnia 94%
- Hospital outcomes in interstitial lung disease-related admissions: a multicentre retrospective study in the North West of England. 93%
- Remote-management of COPD: Evaluating Implementation of Digital Innovation to Enable Routine Care (RECEIVER) – Protocol for a feasibility and service adoption observational cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision-making in acute viral bronchiolitis: a universal guideline and a publication gap 93%
- Machine learning in predicting respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia - challenges, strengths, and opportunities in a global health emergency 92%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Safety of Home Oximetry for Covid-19: A multi-site retrospective observational study 93%
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 92%
- The Diagnostic Accuracy of Subjective Dyspnea in Detecting Hypoxemia Among Outpatients with COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COPD in the time of COVID-19: An analysis of acute exacerbations and reported behavioural changes in patients with COPD 94%
- Development and validation of a parent proxy bronchiectasis child quality of life instrument: The BC-QoL 91%
- Isolated night cough in children: how does it differ from wheeze? 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expectations and attitudes in primary care towards home-based testing for diagnosing asthma: a mixed methods study 92%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 88%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.