Back

Title: COVID-19Predict - Predicting Pandemic Trends.

Bosch, J.; Wilson, A.; O'Neil, K.; Zimmerman, P. A.

2020-09-11 public and global health
10.1101/2020.09.09.20191593 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGiven the global public health importance of the COVID-19 pandemic, data comparisons that predict on-going infection and mortality trends across national, state and county-level administrative jurisdictions are vitally important. We have designed a COVID-19 dashboard with the goal of providing concise sets of summarized data presentations to simplify interpretation of basic statistics and location-specific current and short-term future risks of infection. MethodsWe perform continuous collection and analyses of publicly available data accessible through the COVID-19 dashboard hosted at Johns Hopkins University (JHU github). Additionally, we utilize the accumulation of cases and deaths to provide dynamic 7-day short-term predictions on these outcomes across these national, state and county administrative levels. FindingsCOVID-19Predict produces 2,100 daily predictions [or calculations] on the state level (50 States x3 models x7 days x2 cases and deaths) and 131,964 (3,142 Counties x3 models x7 days x2 cases and deaths) on the county level. To assess how robust our models have performed in making short-term predictions over the course of the pandemic, we used available case data for all 50 U.S. states spanning the period January 20 - August 16 2020 in a retrospective analysis. Results showed a 3.7% to -0.2% mean error of deviation from the actual case predictions to date. InterpretationOur transparent methods and admin-level visualizations provide real-time data reporting and forecasts related to on-going COVID-19 transmission allowing viewers (individuals, health care providers, public health practitioners and policy makers) to develop their own perspectives and expectations regarding public life activity decisions. FundingFinancial resources for this study have been provided by Case Western Reserve University.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.5%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.7%
4
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
7
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
11
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
14
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
19
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
26
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
29
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
30
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%