Frequency and accuracy of proactive testing for COVID-19
Bergstrom, T.; Bergstrom, C. T.; Li, H.
Show abstract
September 5, 2020 The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus has proven difficult to control not only because of its high transmissibility, but because those who are infected readily spread the virus before symptoms appear, and because some infected individuals, though contagious, never exhibit symptoms. Proactive testing of asymptomatic individuals is therefore a powerful, and probably necessary, tool for preventing widespread infection in many settings. This paper explores the effectiveness of alternative testing regimes, in which the frequency, the accuracy, and the delay between testing and results determine the time path of infection. For a simple model of disease transmission, we present analytic formulas that determine the effect of testing on the expected number of days of during which an infectious individual is exposed to the population at large. This allows us to estimate the frequency of testing that would be required to prevent uncontrolled outbreaks, and to explore the trade-offs between frequency, accuracy, and delay in achieving this objective. We conclude by discussing applications to outbreak control on college and university campuses. Competing Interest StatementTed Bergstrom and Haoran Li have no competing interests. Carl Bergstrom consults for Color Genomics on COVID testing schedules.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Acceleration Index as a Test-Controlled Reproduction Number: Application to COVID-19 in France* 96%
- Downsizing of contact tracing during COVID-19 vaccine roll-out 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection dynamics in Denmark, February through October 2020: Nature of the past epidemic and how it may develop in the future 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of COVID-19 variant importation – How useful are travel control measures? 96%
- The relationship between controllability, optimal testing resource allocation, and incubation-latent period mismatch as revealed by COVID-19 95%
- Incorporating the mutational landscape of SARS-COV-2 variants and case-dependent vaccination rates into epidemic models 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling, prediction and design of national COVID-19 lockdowns by stringency and duration 95%
- Mathematical modelling of SARS-CoV-2 variant outbreaks reveals their probability of extinction 95%
- An evaluation of educational institutions safe reopening strategies for in-person classes amid the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.